admin管理员组文章数量:1425815
Has anyone used .animateWith()
in Raphael to successfully keep fast animations in sync? It is poorly documented. The library's creator has a video demonstration but no code I can find.
I have a Javascript metronome that consists of a line (the arm of the metronome) and a trapezoidal shaped "weight" that will eventually move up and down to signify tempo. I have a working fiddle here, and the lines in question are:
var ticktock = Raphael.animation({
"50%": { transform:"R20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: function() { tick(this, repeats, done); }},
"100%": { transform:"R-20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: function() { tick(this, repeats, done); }}
}, interval).repeat(repeats / 2);
arm.animate(ticktock);
weight.animateWith(arm, ticktock, ticktock);
If you check out the fiddle and give it a high tempo and about 20 ticks, you should see the weight lag behind the arm. (Please try it a few times if not -- Murphy's Law etc.) I thought this was precisely what animateWith() prevented. Maybe I am using it incorrectly.
If you look at the Raphael source for the .animateWith() function, you see it syncs the .start param of each animation, FWIW.
Has anyone used .animateWith()
in Raphael to successfully keep fast animations in sync? It is poorly documented. The library's creator has a video demonstration but no code I can find.
I have a Javascript metronome that consists of a line (the arm of the metronome) and a trapezoidal shaped "weight" that will eventually move up and down to signify tempo. I have a working fiddle here, and the lines in question are:
var ticktock = Raphael.animation({
"50%": { transform:"R20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: function() { tick(this, repeats, done); }},
"100%": { transform:"R-20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: function() { tick(this, repeats, done); }}
}, interval).repeat(repeats / 2);
arm.animate(ticktock);
weight.animateWith(arm, ticktock, ticktock);
If you check out the fiddle and give it a high tempo and about 20 ticks, you should see the weight lag behind the arm. (Please try it a few times if not -- Murphy's Law etc.) I thought this was precisely what animateWith() prevented. Maybe I am using it incorrectly.
If you look at the Raphael source for the .animateWith() function, you see it syncs the .start param of each animation, FWIW.
Share Improve this question asked Apr 8, 2013 at 18:46 Chris WilsonChris Wilson 6,7198 gold badges41 silver badges72 bronze badges1 Answer
Reset to default 7 +50From the Raphael documentation:
Parameters:
element - [object] element to sync with
anim - [object] animation to sync with
animation - [object] animation object, see Raphael.animation
So I think your code just need to separate the animation and pass that into second parameter for .animateWith()
:
The animation portion is just:
{
"50%": { transform:"R20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: animationDone },
"100%": { transform:"R-20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: animationDone }
}
So you can do this:
var animationDone = function() {
tick(this, repeats, done);
};
var ticktockAnimationParam = {
"50%": { transform:"R20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: animationDone },
"100%": { transform:"R-20 " + x + "," + y, easing: "sinoid", callback: animationDone }
};
var ticktock = Raphael.animation(ticktockAnimationParam, interval).repeat(repeats / 2);
arm.animate(ticktock);
weight.animateWith(arm, ticktockAnimationParam, ticktock);
See fiddle: http://jsfiddle/wDwsW/7/
Fyi , I moved the callback function outside, instead of using anonymous functions.
本文标签: javascriptHow to use Raphael animateWith()Stack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - How to use Raphael .animateWith() - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1745347050a2654534.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论