admin管理员组文章数量:1415673
I have this array and variable:
var freqId = 45;
$scope.frequencies = [{Id:124,name:'qqq'},
{Id:589,name:'www'},
{Id:45,name:'eee'},
{Id:567,name:'rrr'}]
I use this row to get all id's from array above:
var inspectionsId = $scope.frequencies.map(function (obj) { return obj.Id; })
The result I get is:
var Id's = [124,589,45,567];
I need to change this row:
$scope.frequencies.map(function (obj) { return obj.Id; })
to retrive all id from frequencies array except where Id equal to freqId variable.
For example desired result is:
var inspectionsId = [124,589,567];
Any idea how can I implemet it?
I have this array and variable:
var freqId = 45;
$scope.frequencies = [{Id:124,name:'qqq'},
{Id:589,name:'www'},
{Id:45,name:'eee'},
{Id:567,name:'rrr'}]
I use this row to get all id's from array above:
var inspectionsId = $scope.frequencies.map(function (obj) { return obj.Id; })
The result I get is:
var Id's = [124,589,45,567];
I need to change this row:
$scope.frequencies.map(function (obj) { return obj.Id; })
to retrive all id from frequencies array except where Id equal to freqId variable.
For example desired result is:
var inspectionsId = [124,589,567];
Any idea how can I implemet it?
Share Improve this question asked Aug 14, 2016 at 10:33 MichaelMichael 13.6k59 gold badges170 silver badges315 bronze badges 3-
var inspectionsId = $scope.frequencies.map(obj => obj.Id).filter(id => id != freqId);
– Jaromanda X Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 10:40 -
var inspectionsId = $scope.frequencies.filter(obj => obj.Id != freqId).map(obj => obj.Id);
– Jaromanda X Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 10:41 -
first
filter
thenmap
– webdeb Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 10:45
4 Answers
Reset to default 4You can also use Array.prototype.reduce
to do both filtering and mapping in a single loop:
var freqId = 45;
$scope = {}; // Dummy scope
$scope.frequencies = [{
Id: 124,
name: 'qqq'
}, {
Id: 589,
name: 'www'
}, {
Id: 45,
name: 'eee'
}, {
Id: 567,
name: 'rrr'
}]
var result = $scope.frequencies.reduce(function(result, current) {
if (current.Id != freqId) {
result.push(current.Id);
}
return result;
}, []);
console.log(JSON.stringify(result));
map
is designed to transform data, not filter it. Chain it with filter
for the latter.
var freqId = 45;
var input = [{
Id: 124,
name: 'qqq'
}, {
Id: 589,
name: 'www'
}, {
Id: 45,
name: 'eee'
}, {
Id: 567,
name: 'rrr'
}];
var output = input.map(function(obj) {
return obj.Id;
}).filter(function(element) {
return element != freqId
});
console.log(output);
You can use Array.prototype.filter
:
var inspectionsId = $scope.frequencies
.map(function(obj) { return obj.Id; })
.filter(function(id) { return id !== 45 })
You'll have seen the filter
answers. 99.999% of the time, that's the way to go.
If you have a truly massive array and you think it's important to make just a single pass through it, you could give yourself a function bining map
and filter
:
// A value to use to mean "leave entry out"
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "OMIT", {
value: {}
});
// The utility function
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "mapFilter", {
value: function(f, thisArg, omissionFlag) {
var result = [];
if (arguments.length < 3) {
omissionFlag = Array.OMIT;
}
Object.keys(this).forEach(function(index) {
var value = f.call(thisArg, this[index], index, this);
if (value !== omissionFlag) {
result.push(value);
}
}, this);
return result;
}
});
// Using it
var freqId = 45;
var input = [{Id: 124, name: 'qqq'}, {Id: 589, name: 'www'}, {Id: 45, name: 'eee'}, {Id: 567, name: 'rrr'}];
var output = input.mapFilter(function(obj) {
return obj.Id == freqId ? Array.OMIT : obj.Id;
});
console.log(output);
This version accepts up to three arguments:
The map/filter function
The value to use as
this
during callbacksThe value to use to mean "omit this entry," which defaults to
Array.OMIT
It calls its callback with the value, index, and array just like forEach
and map
and such do.
Again, though, I'll emphasize that in the vast, vast majority of cases, filter
and then map
(or map
and then filter
if the map
makes filter
ing easier) is the way to go.
That said, a generic "loop with memo" function has broader applicability:
// The utility function
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "memoLoop", {
value: function(memo, f, thisArg) {
Object.keys(this).forEach(function(index) {
f.call(thisArg, memo, this[index], index, this);
}, this);
return memo;
}
});
// Using it
var freqId = 45;
var input = [{Id: 124, name: 'qqq'}, {Id: 589, name: 'www'}, {Id: 45, name: 'eee'}, {Id: 567, name: 'rrr'}];
var output = input.memoLoop([], function(result, obj) {
var id = obj.Id;
if (id != freqId) {
result.push(id);
}
});
console.log(output);
It's a bit like Array#reduce
but assumes an unchanging memo value (in our case, the new array), which simplifies the callback somewhat.
本文标签: How to make Javascript map function not to return specific valueStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:How to make Javascript map function not to return specific value? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1745209500a2647797.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论