admin管理员组文章数量:1406937
I was going through the polyfill of Array.isArray
method on MDN, and this is what I found:
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(arg) === '[object Array]';
};
}
While this works, I wonder why MDN hasn't listed the following as the polyfill for isArray
?
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return arg.constructor === Array;
};
}
Above code is a bit short and simpler. I wonder if there is any advantage of using MDN's implementation as pared to above one?
I was going through the polyfill of Array.isArray
method on MDN, and this is what I found:
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(arg) === '[object Array]';
};
}
While this works, I wonder why MDN hasn't listed the following as the polyfill for isArray
?
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return arg.constructor === Array;
};
}
Above code is a bit short and simpler. I wonder if there is any advantage of using MDN's implementation as pared to above one?
Share Improve this question asked May 28, 2020 at 20:42 darKnightdarKnight 6,48115 gold badges58 silver badges93 bronze badges 9-
2
If you get an object from an iframe, for example it's going to be an array but it will not be created from your current
Array
constructor, so that check will fail. – VLAZ Commented May 28, 2020 at 20:50 - @VLAZ: Didn't quite get that. Why should an object/Array from an iFrame be any different? Can you demonstrate with code what you are trying to say? – darKnight Commented May 28, 2020 at 20:52
-
1
It's an array but es from a different environment. The constructor function is a different instance of
Array
. And as we knowfunction() {} === function() {}
is false. – VLAZ Commented May 28, 2020 at 20:53 - Does this answer your question? Difference between using Array.isArray and instanceof Array – VLAZ Commented May 28, 2020 at 20:58
-
instanceof Array
is pretty much patible with your suggested== Array
. The same problems arise - it fails cross-environment, as you'd be trying to pare different instances ofArray
. This answer talks about the problem directly. – VLAZ Commented May 28, 2020 at 21:00
2 Answers
Reset to default 7The most important reason that makes the MDN polyfill a safe one to use is that an array is an exotic object. The best way to differentiate an exotic object would be through the use of an exotic feature related to that object – that is to say, an exotic property of the exotic object.
If you look at the specification of the Object.prototype.toString method, you will find that it uses the abstract operation isArray, which checks for exotic array objects.
On the other hand look at the specification of the constructor property. It is not an exotic property of the array, and so javascript code can change it easily.
const x = [];
x.constructor = Object
In fact, the constructor property is more intended for meta programming. You could – in es5 – create subclasses without touching the constructor property.
Now, here are things that can go wrong with your implementation:
const customIsArray = function(arg) {
return arg.constructor === Array;
};
// 1) won't work with subclasses of Array
class CustomArray extends Array {
// ...
}
const customArray = new CustomArray()
customIsArray(customArray) // false
Array.isArray(customArray) // true
// 2) won't work across different realms (iframes, web workers, service workers ... if we are speaking about the browser environment)
const iframe = document.createElement('iframe')
document.body.appendChild(iframe)
const IframeArray = iframe.contentWindow.Array;
const iframeArray = new IframeArray();
customIsArray(iframeArray) // false
Array.isArray(iframeArray) // true
// 3) won't work with few edge cases like (customIsArray will return true, while Array.isArray will return false)
const fakeArray1 = { __proto__: Array.prototype }
const fakeArray2 = { constructor: Array }
customIsArray(fakeArray1) // true
Array.isArray(fakeArray1) // false
customIsArray(fakeArray2) // true
Array.isArray(fakeArray2) // false
One problem would be that a non-array object with a constructor
property of Array
would pass when it shouldn't:
// Bad polyfill, do not use
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return arg.constructor === Array;
};
const badObj = {};
badObj.constructor = Array;
console.log(Array.isArray(badObj));
The above would be a very strange situation, but a polyfill must be as spec-pliant as possible, even if it requires more convoluted code.
本文标签: javascriptUnderstanding ArrayisArray PolyfillStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - Understanding Array.isArray Polyfill - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1745051830a2639701.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论