admin管理员组文章数量:1379518
In a JavaScript (client) + PHP (server) website, I have this scheme for saving an "online notepad
" (in a #textbox
textarea) to server:
// client-side
$("#save-button").on('click', save);
function save(e) {
$.ajax({ type: "POST",
url: "/php/save.php",
data: { projectname: $('#projectname').text(),
data: $('#textbox').text() },
success: function(data) { alert('Data saved'); },
error: function(data) { console.log(data); } });
}
and this on server-side (/php/save.php
):
<?php
$projectname = $_POST['projectname'];
$data = $_POST['data'];
// save this into database
?>
What is the equivalent "post to server and save on server" scheme in node.js (client+server)? (using express
for example)
Is there a well-known node.js "pattern
" for such task?
Is it mon / good practice to use $.ajax(...)
on client and node.js on server? I thought node.js introduced a new way of thinking, making ajax not-needed-anymore... am I wrong?
In a JavaScript (client) + PHP (server) website, I have this scheme for saving an "online notepad
" (in a #textbox
textarea) to server:
// client-side
$("#save-button").on('click', save);
function save(e) {
$.ajax({ type: "POST",
url: "/php/save.php",
data: { projectname: $('#projectname').text(),
data: $('#textbox').text() },
success: function(data) { alert('Data saved'); },
error: function(data) { console.log(data); } });
}
and this on server-side (/php/save.php
):
<?php
$projectname = $_POST['projectname'];
$data = $_POST['data'];
// save this into database
?>
What is the equivalent "post to server and save on server" scheme in node.js (client+server)? (using express
for example)
Is there a well-known node.js "pattern
" for such task?
Is it mon / good practice to use $.ajax(...)
on client and node.js on server? I thought node.js introduced a new way of thinking, making ajax not-needed-anymore... am I wrong?
-
Surely, you are not obliged to make
ajax
calls in your web-app, but 1. such approach is notnodeJS
specific 2. it would require to use some other form of munication (e.g. deep url reloads or WebSockets). – artur grzesiak Commented Dec 23, 2014 at 14:00
2 Answers
Reset to default 6 +50
- What's the equivalent "post to server and save on server" scheme in node.js (client+server)? (using express for example)
being specific to your code, it should be looking something like this.
client-side:-
$("#save-button").on('click', save);
function save(e) {
$.ajax({ type: "POST",
url: "/php/save",
data: { projectname: $('#projectname').text(),
data: $('#textbox').text() },
success: function(data) { alert('Data saved'); },
error: function(data) { console.log(data); } });
}
And server side:-
router.post('/php/save', function(req, res) { // server side
var projectName = req.body.projectname;
var data = req.body.data;
// save the data here to database
});
here the way I receive the post data in node, I need to require body-parser module so this should be added at the top,
var bodyParser = require('body-parser');
this will parse your http request body so you can access the parameters directly as req.body.data.
- Is it mon / good practice to use $.ajax(...) on client and node.js on server?
$.ajax(...) on client :- Of-course , why not.. don't we use $.ajax(...)
when we use different backend technologies like or java? So there is no need for changing your front end, It is just you are using a different technology on the back-end
node on server :- Now this is quite opinion based, node is new, we javascript developers love node, because it is single technology on serverside and client as well, I would say node is fantastic.. but there are other people who would say node is crap. I would rather skip answering this part.
- node.js introduced a new way of thinking, making ajax not-needed-anymore...
I think you are pointing towards websockets
. yes node is a different way of thinking. This does not really replace ajax, you can find some info here
The purpose of WebSockets is to provide a low-latency, bi-directional, full-duplex and long-running connection between a browser and server. WebSockets open up new application domains to browser applications that were not really possible using HTTP and AJAX (interactive games, dynamic media streams, bridging to existing network protocols, etc).
If you don't need the specific benefits that WebSockets provide, then it's probably a better idea to stick with existing techniques like AJAX and Comet because this allows you to re-use and integrate with a huge existing ecosystem of tools, technologies, security mechanisms, knowledge bases (i.e. far more people on stackoverflow know HTTP/Ajax/Comet than WebSockets), etc.
And this is not node.js specific thing, you can still implement websockets in other technologies as well.
So node.js introduced a new way of thinking, making ajax not-needed-anymore is wrong !
You would only need to change the server side. Depending on how you have the server set up, your code might look something like this:
router.post('/php/save.php', function(req, res) {
var projectName = req.param('projectname');
var data = req.param('data');
});
本文标签: javascriptnodejs equivalent of a standard PHP ajax saving schemeStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - node.js equivalent of a standard PHP ajax saving scheme - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1744505970a2609594.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论