admin管理员组文章数量:1401623
Summary of the Issue:
I'm working on a Java application where Fortify flagged a Server-Side Request Fery (SSRF) vulnerability in a method that sends a message over a socket connection.
Code snippet:
public synchronized void sendMessage(String msg, long id) {
try {
msg = utils.sanitizeInput(msg);
OutputStream osb = clientSocket.getOutputStream();
byte[] dataBytes = msg.getBytes();
osb.write(1);
osb.write(224);
osb.write(dataBytes);
osb.flush();
} catch (Exception e) {
// Handle exception
}
}
Context:
- The
msg
value comes from a input stream in another socket connection, is validated and transformed multiple times by other services so it meets the protocol of the recipient. - The input is sanitized using
utils.sanitizeInput(msg)
, but Fortify still flags theosb.write(dataBytes)
line as vulnerable.
Why Fortify Marks It as a Vulnerability:
- Fortify likely detects that
msg
is user-controlled and could potentially be manipulated to perform a SSRF attack or other malicious activity. - Even though
sanitizeInput()
is applied, Fortify may not recognize it as an effective sanitization method.
Question:
- What’s the best way to address this type of warning in a socket communication context?
- Would using a library like
.owasp
for input sanitization help resolve this? - Are there any recommended patterns for securely handling user input in socket-based communication?
Any insights or suggestions would be highly appreciated!
Summary of the Issue:
I'm working on a Java application where Fortify flagged a Server-Side Request Fery (SSRF) vulnerability in a method that sends a message over a socket connection.
Code snippet:
public synchronized void sendMessage(String msg, long id) {
try {
msg = utils.sanitizeInput(msg);
OutputStream osb = clientSocket.getOutputStream();
byte[] dataBytes = msg.getBytes();
osb.write(1);
osb.write(224);
osb.write(dataBytes);
osb.flush();
} catch (Exception e) {
// Handle exception
}
}
Context:
- The
msg
value comes from a input stream in another socket connection, is validated and transformed multiple times by other services so it meets the protocol of the recipient. - The input is sanitized using
utils.sanitizeInput(msg)
, but Fortify still flags theosb.write(dataBytes)
line as vulnerable.
Why Fortify Marks It as a Vulnerability:
- Fortify likely detects that
msg
is user-controlled and could potentially be manipulated to perform a SSRF attack or other malicious activity. - Even though
sanitizeInput()
is applied, Fortify may not recognize it as an effective sanitization method.
Question:
- What’s the best way to address this type of warning in a socket communication context?
- Would using a library like
.owasp
for input sanitization help resolve this? - Are there any recommended patterns for securely handling user input in socket-based communication?
Any insights or suggestions would be highly appreciated!
Share Improve this question asked Mar 25 at 2:27 GustavoPGustavoP 11 bronze badge1 Answer
Reset to default 0The issue was resolved by using ESAPI from .owasp like so:
import .owasp.esapi.Validator;
import .owasp.esapi.reference.DefaultValidator;
Validator validator = DefaultValidator.getInstance();
// Before converting to bytes
msg = validator.getValidInput("SocketMessage", msg, "SafeString", 100, false);
本文标签: javaSSFR From Fortify when writing to SocketStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:java - SSFR From Fortify when writing to Socket - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1744220048a2595822.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论