admin管理员组

文章数量:1357392

There is a limited number of functions that POSIX defines as async-signal safe. See here.

This includes some fundamental functions such as write.

Since this is really a C standard (since unix is built on C) that makes no mention of C++, I would expect this to be undefined, but the question is: can I use any c++ functions or classes (which involve constructors/destructors etc) inside a signal handler? For example: can I construct a std::string or std::pair?

malloc is not on the list of async-signal safe functions, so it is probably safe to assume that the potential memory allocation used by std::string makes it async-signal unsafe in the general sense (?).

本文标签： linuxasyncsignal safety of c classesStack Overflow

版权声明：本文标题：linux - async-signal safety of c++ classes - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献，该文观点仅代表作者本人， 转载请联系作者并注明出处：http://www.betaflare.com/web/1743989567a2571885.html， 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容，一经查实，本站将立刻删除。