javascript - JavasScript event handling best practice? - Stack Overflow

admin管理员组

文章数量:1356227

When defining a JavaScript call, like so:

<input type="button" onclick="someJavaScriptFunction" />

What is the best way to write the actual call? I've seen numerous method:

javascript:someJavascriptFunction();

or

justSomeJavaScriptFunction();

or

withoutTheSemicolon()

Are there any benefits or caveats to any of the methods? I realize that using addEventListener is more flexible in certain cases.

When defining a JavaScript call, like so:

<input type="button" onclick="someJavaScriptFunction" />

What is the best way to write the actual call? I've seen numerous method:

javascript:someJavascriptFunction();

or

justSomeJavaScriptFunction();

or

withoutTheSemicolon()

Are there any benefits or caveats to any of the methods? I realize that using addEventListener is more flexible in certain cases.

• javascript
• dom-events

Share Improve this question Follow edited Feb 18, 2023 at 22:33 Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩 5,8937272 gold badges6161 silver badges133133 bronze badges asked Jun 7, 2011 at 17:04 voithosvoithos 70.7k1212 gold badges106106 silver badges120120 bronze badges

Add a ment  | 

6 Answers 6

Sorted by: Reset to default 5

The best practice itself is to use JavaScript itself to attach the events:

Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera...

document.getElementById('someID').addEventListener('click', function() {
    function1();
    function2();
    function3();
});

IE:

document.getElementByID('someID').attachEvent('onclick', function() {
    function1();
    function2();
    function3();
});

Combine the two to get it to work.

Also, use premade frameworks like MooTools or JQuery to make this even easier.

If you want best practice, separate markup from script content. Assign your event handlers in script elements. As you say, using addEventListener is one way of doing this, although you have to use attachEvent as well if you want to support versions of Internet Explorer before version 9.

It's perfectly valid, however, to assign onevent properties. For instance:

<script>
    window.onload = function() {
        document.getElementById('yourID').onclick = function() {
           alert('element clicked');
        };
    };
</script>

This may well suit your purpose adequately, if you only have a few items.

javascript:someJavascriptFunction();

We use javascript: as URL in href attribute or in bookmark address filed (bookmarklets). For example:

<a href="javascript:myFunction()">click me</a>

We use semicolon to attach more than one JavaScript instruction:

<span onclick="alert('first');alert('second')">click me</span>

addEventListener allows to attach many functions to same event:

element.addEventListener ('click', firstFunction);
element.addEventListener ('click', secondFunction);

With or without the semicolon makes no difference, however the event is actually a line of javascript not just a function name so you could use the semicolon to add multiple functions like so:

<input type="button" onclick="function1();function2();function3();" />

I'm not sure javascript: will work at all, that is just if you attach a function as an href on a link, not as an event handler like below:

<a href="javascript:function1();function2();function3();" >A link</a>

javascript:someJavascriptFunction(); Explicitly state to use javascript, in the case that you may have multiple/different scripts types such as ECMA Script.

someJavascriptFunction() is fine if you only have Javascript(s) on your page (rather than having multiple script types.

someJavascriptFunction();doSomethingElse();return false; Semi-colon used to chain/have multiple statements.

So there is no 'best' way, just what makes most sense, and is your preferred convention (in most cases).

addEventListener is the best way

本文标签： javascriptJavasScript event handling best practiceStack Overflow