admin管理员组文章数量:1333619
I have this React Component
export class Timer extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {i : props.i};
}
ponentDidMount(){
this.decrementCounter();
}
decrementCounter(){
if(this.state.i < 1){
return;
}
setTimeout(() => {
this.setState({i : this.state.i - 1})
this.decrementCounter()}, 1000);
}
render(){
return <span>{this.state.i}</span>
}}
And I want to express a test like this
jest.useFakeTimers();
it('should decrement timer ', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Timer i={10} />);
expect(wrapper.text()).toBe("10");
jest.runOnlyPendingTimers();
expect(wrapper.text()).toBe("9");
});
currently the first expect pass but the second fails
Expected value to be (using ===):
"9"
Received:
"10"
How can I properly test this ponent ?
I have this React Component
export class Timer extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {i : props.i};
}
ponentDidMount(){
this.decrementCounter();
}
decrementCounter(){
if(this.state.i < 1){
return;
}
setTimeout(() => {
this.setState({i : this.state.i - 1})
this.decrementCounter()}, 1000);
}
render(){
return <span>{this.state.i}</span>
}}
And I want to express a test like this
jest.useFakeTimers();
it('should decrement timer ', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Timer i={10} />);
expect(wrapper.text()).toBe("10");
jest.runOnlyPendingTimers();
expect(wrapper.text()).toBe("9");
});
currently the first expect pass but the second fails
Expected value to be (using ===):
"9"
Received:
"10"
How can I properly test this ponent ?
Share Improve this question asked Apr 23, 2017 at 9:19 Anis SmailAnis Smail 7797 silver badges22 bronze badges1 Answer
Reset to default 8Use Full Rendering API, mount(...)
Full DOM rendering is ideal for use cases where you have ponents that may interact with DOM APIs, or may require the full lifecycle in order to fully test the ponent (i.e., ponentDidMount etc.)
You can use mount()
instead of shallow()
like
import React from 'react';
import { mount, /* shallow */ } from 'enzyme';
import Timer from './index';
describe('Timer', () => {
it('should decrement timer ', () => {
jest.useFakeTimers();
const wrapper = mount(<Timer i={10} />);
expect(wrapper.text()).toBe("10");
jest.runOnlyPendingTimers();
expect(wrapper.text()).toBe("9");
jest.useRealTimers();
});
});
Or you can pass additional object to shallow
to instrument it to run lifecycle methods
- see ShallowWrapper.js sourcode
- see shallow() docs
options.disableLifecycleMethods: (Boolean [optional]): If set to true, ponentDidMount is not called on the ponent, and ponentDidUpdate is not called after setProps and setContext.
const options = {
lifecycleExperimental: true,
disableLifecycleMethods: false
};
const wrapper = shallow(<Timer i={10} />, options);
I tested it. It works.
hinok:~/workspace $ npm test
> [email protected] test /home/ubuntu/workspace
> jest
PASS ./index.spec.js (7.302s)
Timer
✓ should decrement timer (28ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 1 passed, 1 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 8.162s
Ran all test suites.
本文标签: javascriptHow to test a React component that update over time with Jest and EnzymeStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - How to test a React component that update over time with Jest and Enzyme? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1742349622a2458224.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论