admin管理员组文章数量:1323722
When using the MIT license (or any license in general) in a project, should the license date next to my name reflect the initial creation year of the project or the current year, especially if the project is still actively being developed and maintained?
When using the MIT license (or any license in general) in a project, should the license date next to my name reflect the initial creation year of the project or the current year, especially if the project is still actively being developed and maintained?
Share Improve this question asked Jan 12 at 5:14 Oussama TeyibOussama Teyib 915 bronze badges1 Answer
Reset to default 0Have a look at this other question / answer.
In principle you should have the year of first creation as also specified in this official document.
But if during a following year, you or somebody else made some relevant changes, then the license date should be update listing also the new year. To avoid having a long list of years, also a range of years can be used.
本文标签: licensingWhat date should the license date reflectStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:licensing - What date should the license date reflect? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1742122305a2421772.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论