admin管理员组文章数量:1318570
I'm calling .bind(this)
on an async function defined in another module inside of a class constructor.
The class is as below
class CannedItem {
constructor (config) {
...
this._fetch = config.fetch.bind(this)
...
}
...
}
The function is something like
module.exports = [
{
...
fetch: async () => {
// Want to refer to 'this' bound to the CannedItem object here
}
}
]
However when the function is called, this
is bound to an empty object.
Confusingly Visual Studio Code debugger has the object in scope bound as this
in the debugger window, see attached screenshot, however inspecting the variable in the console lists it as undefined. This looks to me like there is a bug. Is this the case or am I misusing .bind()
?
The only thing that seems a little unusual is the async function. I tried searching for issues with async and .bind()
but no dice.
I am running NodeJs 8.11.1 and the latest VSCode (1.30.2)
I'm calling .bind(this)
on an async function defined in another module inside of a class constructor.
The class is as below
class CannedItem {
constructor (config) {
...
this._fetch = config.fetch.bind(this)
...
}
...
}
The function is something like
module.exports = [
{
...
fetch: async () => {
// Want to refer to 'this' bound to the CannedItem object here
}
}
]
However when the function is called, this
is bound to an empty object.
Confusingly Visual Studio Code debugger has the object in scope bound as this
in the debugger window, see attached screenshot, however inspecting the variable in the console lists it as undefined. This looks to me like there is a bug. Is this the case or am I misusing .bind()
?
The only thing that seems a little unusual is the async function. I tried searching for issues with async and .bind()
but no dice.
I am running NodeJs 8.11.1 and the latest VSCode (1.30.2)
Share Improve this question edited Mar 11, 2019 at 14:26 Gama11 34.2k9 gold badges89 silver badges106 bronze badges asked Jan 11, 2019 at 22:51 BrendanBrendan 19.4k19 gold badges89 silver badges117 bronze badges 1- The question was actually about use of async, not about binding of arrow function, so reference to duplicate is not useful. The question stackoverflow./questions/53313507/… Is more relevant – Michael Freidgeim Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 8:34
1 Answer
Reset to default 6You can't rebind arrow functions because this
is fixed to the lexically defined this
. You need a regular function if you plan on using bind()
or any of its relatives:
class CannedItem {
constructor(config) {
this.myname = "Mark"
this._fetch = config.fetch.bind(this)
}
}
let obj = {
fetch: async() => { // won't work
return this.myname
// Want to refer to 'this' bound to the CannedItem object here
}
}
let obj2 = {
async fetch() { // works
return this.myname
// Want to refer to 'this' bound to the CannedItem object here
}
}
// pass arrow function object
let c1 = new CannedItem(obj)
c1._fetch().then(console.log) // undefined
// pass regular function object
let c2 = new CannedItem(obj2)
c2._fetch().then(console.log) // Mark
As a bonus, if you use a regular function, you might not need bind()
.
this._fetch = config.fetch
will work if you call it from the instance.
本文标签: javascriptCalling bind() on an async function partially worksStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - Calling `bind()` on an async function partially works - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1742047421a2417870.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论