admin管理员组

文章数量:1303404

Instead of having a META-INF/maven/plugin.xml declaring the mojo, can we leverage the sisu-Guice integration to do something like

@Named
public class MyModule extends AbstractModule {

    @Override
    protected void configure() {
        bind(Mojo.class)
          .annotatedWith(Names.named(MyMojo.class.getName()))
          .to(MyMojo.class); // or similar
    }
  
}

with a Mojo defined as

@Named("my-mojo")
public class MyMojo extends AbstractMojo {
...
}

It seems Maven is needing a PluginDescriptor, containing a MojoDescriptor, which are populated when parsing the META-INF/maven/plugin.xml. Is there a way around that ?

本文标签： guiceIs it possible to bind a Maven mojo programaticallyStack Overflow

版权声明：本文标题：guice - Is it possible to bind a Maven mojo programatically? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献，该文观点仅代表作者本人， 转载请联系作者并注明出处：http://www.betaflare.com/web/1741671755a2391646.html， 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容，一经查实，本站将立刻删除。