admin管理员组

文章数量:1287867

I noticed that starting from ServiceStack version 8.6, it is no longer possible to use anonymous types when calling REST services (unless modifying AssemblyUtils.ValidateTypeName).

Currently, I create anonymous objects and make the HTTP request. how can I handle this situation?

I noticed that starting from ServiceStack version 8.6, it is no longer possible to use anonymous types when calling REST services (unless modifying AssemblyUtils.ValidateTypeName).

Currently, I create anonymous objects and make the HTTP request. how can I handle this situation?

  • c#
  • asp-mvc
  • servicestack
Share Improve this question edited Feb 24 at 3:37 w4rcT asked Feb 22 at 19:01 w4rcTw4rcT 3422 silver badges13 bronze badges
Add a comment  | 

1 Answer 1

Reset to default 1

The safest way of passing an arbitrary payload is to encode it in a string (e.g. JSON or Base64) and have the client deserialize the string into the preferred type.

You could also convert it into a Dictionary<string,object> with Reflection Utils T.ToObjectDictionary() extension method and converted back into a Type with map.FromObjectDictionary<T>() extension method. This benefits from cleaner (unencoded) JSON, but using object isn't supported in non .NET Add ServiceStack Reference languages, although neither was anonymous types.

本文标签： cServicestack v86 anonymous typeStack Overflow

版权声明：本文标题：c# - Servicestack v.8.6 anonymous type - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献，该文观点仅代表作者本人， 转载请联系作者并注明出处：http://www.betaflare.com/web/1741329769a2372700.html， 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容，一经查实，本站将立刻删除。