admin管理员组文章数量:1291197
Imagine I have this code:
var myFunc1 = function(event) {
alert(1);
}
var myFunc2 = function(event) {
alert(2);
}
element.addEventListener('click', myFunc1);
element.addEventListener('click', myFunc2);
When the click event is fired myFunc1 is called, then myFunc2. But how do I (if at all possible) stop myFunc2 from being called if some condition in myFunc1 is met? event.stopPropagation()
is not the solution, as this is not an event capturing/bubbling problem.
Thanks.
Imagine I have this code:
var myFunc1 = function(event) {
alert(1);
}
var myFunc2 = function(event) {
alert(2);
}
element.addEventListener('click', myFunc1);
element.addEventListener('click', myFunc2);
When the click event is fired myFunc1 is called, then myFunc2. But how do I (if at all possible) stop myFunc2 from being called if some condition in myFunc1 is met? event.stopPropagation()
is not the solution, as this is not an event capturing/bubbling problem.
Thanks.
Share Improve this question edited Jul 12, 2009 at 9:30 Jack Sleight asked Jul 12, 2009 at 0:16 Jack SleightJack Sleight 17.1k6 gold badges44 silver badges55 bronze badges 2- Are they always called together? – Ian Elliott Commented Jul 12, 2009 at 0:17
- No, sometimes I'm only using one or the other. And the listeners are added in different components, so can't be combined. – Jack Sleight Commented Jul 12, 2009 at 0:23
5 Answers
Reset to default 17The DOM Level 3 method event.stopImmediatePropagation
is exactly what I need here. Unfortunately, it's not currently implemented in any browser (that I know of).
There's a further problem: the order that event listeners are executed is undefined. You'll need to handle event dispatch on your own to get around this, which leads us to some variant of llimllib's suggestion.
function dispatchSleightEvent(evt) {
var listeners = evt.currentTarget.sleightListeners[evt.type];
// can't use for-in because enumeration order is implementation dependent
for (var i=0; i<listeners.length; ++i) {
if (listeners[i]) {
if (! listeners[i].call(evt.currentTarget, evt)) {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
function mixinSleightTarget(obj) {
if (! obj.sleightListeners) {
obj.sleightListeners = {}
obj.addSleightListener = function(type, listener) {
if (!this.sleightListeners[type]) {
this.sleightListeners[type] = [];
this.addEventListener(type, dispatchSleightEvent);
}
if (!this.sleightListeners[type+listener] {
this.sleightListeners[type+listener] = this.sleightListeners[type].length;
this.sleightListeners[type].push(listener);
}
}
obj.removeSleightListener = function(type, listener) {
if (this.sleightListeners[type+listener] {
delete this.sleightListeners[type][this.sleightListeners[type+listener]];
delete this.sleightListeners[type+listener];
}
}
}
}
This code is completely untested. To stop event dispatch while on a single target, an event listener returns false
. If you want more data hiding, you can rewrite the above from a functional programming standpoint, though this might introduce memory leaks.
Still looking for a better solution, but this may be the only way to do it:
var myFunc1 = function(event) {
alert(1);
if (something) {
event.cancel = true;
}
}
var myFunc2 = function(event) {
if (event.cancel) {
return;
}
alert(2);
}
document.body.addEventListener('click', myFunc1, false);
document.body.addEventListener('click', myFunc2, false);
Thoughts/comments welcome.
I'll start with the simplest answer that satisfies the constraints you've given so far. If it doesn't meet some condition you haven't yet specified, let me know and I'll update it.
Only allow one click handler, and call functions based on conditions there. Your test code becomes:
var myFunc1 = function(event) {
alert(1);
}
var myFunc2 = function(event) {
alert(2);
}
var clickHandler = function(event) {
if (f1active) myFunc1(event);
if (f2active) myFunc2(event);
}
element.addEventListener('click', clickHandler);
var f1active = true;
var f2active = true;
and you can of course put any conditions you want to in clickHandler.
I second the outis solution, sounds like you need to decorate or adapt the existing DOM event dispatching model with your own event dispatcher.
Did some searching and found this link, which may or may not suit your needs, based on an actionscript dispatcher implementation, dated 2007.
http://positionabsolute.net/blog/2007/06/event-dispatcher.php
Web archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20170330152239/http://positionabsolute.net/blog/2007/06/event-dispatcher.php
Of course I'm not really a javascripter, so give me a heads up if this is not relevant.
本文标签: javascriptstop additional event listenersStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:JavaScript, stop additional event listeners - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1738066714a2058046.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论