admin管理员组文章数量:1410731
I have a forEach that calls a function. There needs to be a delay between each time it is called. I've put it inside a setTimeout inside the forEach. It isn't respecting the timeout after the first wait. Instead it is waiting once, then running all at once. I've set the timeout to 5 seconds and I am using a console to confirm. 5 seconds of wait, then several foobar console logs all at once.
Why am I getting this behavior?
var index = 0;
json.objects.forEach(function(obj) {
setTimeout(function(){
console.log('foobar');
self.insertDesignJsonObject(obj, index);
}, 5000);
});
I have a forEach that calls a function. There needs to be a delay between each time it is called. I've put it inside a setTimeout inside the forEach. It isn't respecting the timeout after the first wait. Instead it is waiting once, then running all at once. I've set the timeout to 5 seconds and I am using a console to confirm. 5 seconds of wait, then several foobar console logs all at once.
Why am I getting this behavior?
var index = 0;
json.objects.forEach(function(obj) {
setTimeout(function(){
console.log('foobar');
self.insertDesignJsonObject(obj, index);
}, 5000);
});
Share
Improve this question
edited Jun 22, 2016 at 20:54
Goose
asked Jun 22, 2016 at 20:23
GooseGoose
4,8215 gold badges50 silver badges90 bronze badges
13
|
Show 8 more comments
4 Answers
Reset to default 53What Jason said is totally correct in his answer but I thought I would give it a shot, to better clarify.
This is actually a classic closure problem. Typically it would look something like:
for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++){
setTimeout(function(){
console.log(i);
},i * 1000)
}
The novice would expect the console to show:
0
(0 seconds pass...)
1
(1 second passes...)
2
(etc..)
But that just isn't the case! What you would actually see is the number 10
getting logged 10 times (1x per second)!
"Why does that happen?" Great question. Closure scope. The for
loop above lacks closure scope because in javascript, only functions (lambdas) have closure scope!
See: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Closures
However! Your attempt would have achieved the desired output if you had tried this:
json.objects.forEach(function(obj,index,collection) {
setTimeout(function(){
console.log('foobar');
self.insertDesignJsonObject(obj, index);
}, index * 5000);
});
Because you have access to the "closur-ed" index
variable - you can rely on its state being the expected state when the function (lambda) is invoked!
Other Resources:
How do JavaScript closures work?
http://javascript.info/tutorial/closures
http://code.tutsplus.com/tutorials/closures-front-to-back--net-24869
setTimeout is async. What it does is register a callback function and put it in background which will be triggered after delay. Whereas forEach is synchronous function. So what your code did is register callbacks "all at once" that each will be triggered after 5 seconds.
Two ways to avoid it:
Have an index to set the timer.
json.objects.forEach(function(obj, index) {
setTimeout(function(){
// do whatever
}, 5000 * (index + 1));
});
This way the delay factor is based on the index of your objects, so even you register them at same time, it will trigger based on their own delay. index + 1
to keep the same result as in question since it starts at 0.
setInterval to loop your objects
var i = 0;
var interval = setInterval(function(){
var obj = json.objects[i];
// do whatever
i++;
if(i === json.objects.length) clearInterval(interval);
}, 5000);
setInterval is similar to setTimeout, although it triggers periodically based on interval. In here we access object and update the index inside of the interval function. Also don't forget to clear interval in the end.
The difference between those two is setInterval only registered one function compare to setTimeout registered as many as number of items in the list.
forEach
runs synchronously, looping through all of your elements and scheduling a timer callback for each of them five seconds later. So five seconds later, all those callbacks happen.
Here in 2022, there are two primary approaches here:
Use chained
setTimeout
with anindex
variable.Use an
async
function,await
, and a loop.
Here's an example of #1:
const json = {
objects: [
{name: "first object"},
{name: "second object"},
{name: "third object"},
{name: "fourth object"},
{name: "fifth object"},
],
};
function insertDesignJsonObject(obj, index) {
console.log(obj.name, index);
}
let index = 0; // The index of the next element to show
function doNext() {
// Do this one, increment the index
/*self.*/insertDesignJsonObject(json.objects[index], index);
++index;
// If we still have one to do, do it after a delay
if (index < json.objects.length) {
setTimeout(doNext, 1000); // 5000 for a five-second delay
}
}
doNext();
Here's #2:
const json = {
objects: [
{name: "first object"},
{name: "second object"},
{name: "third object"},
{name: "fourth object"},
{name: "fifth object"},
],
};
function insertDesignJsonObject(obj, index) {
console.log(obj.name, index);
}
const delay = ms => new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms));
(async () => {
for (let index = 0; index < json.objects.length; ++index) {
// Wait to do this one until a delay after the last one
if (index > 0) {
await delay(1000); // 5000 for five seconds
}
// Do this one
/*self.*/insertDesignJsonObject(json.objects[index], index);
}
})();
var i =0;
img_list.forEach(function(item){
setTimeout(function(){
img_class.setAttribute('src',item)
console.log(item)
},2000 * i++)
})
本文标签: javascriptsetTimeout not working inside forEachStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - setTimeout not working inside forEach - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1737103881a1962978.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
setTimeout
would be sequential? Hint: All the timers run concurrently. – Dark Falcon Commented Jun 22, 2016 at 20:25first object ... 5secs ... second object ... 5 secs ... third object
you would have to "loosen" the loop, i.e. remove the forEach, set counter to 0, get the element with index "counter", start a timeout, in the callback of the timeout set counter to 1, get element with index 1 etc etc – devnull69 Commented Jun 22, 2016 at 20:30index
variable defined? – Barmar Commented Jun 22, 2016 at 20:49