JavaScript: undefined !== undefined? - Stack Overflow

admin管理员组

文章数量:1135140

NOTE: As per ECMAScript5.1, section 15.1.1.3, window.undefined is read-only.

• Modern browsers implement this correctly. for example: Safari 5.1, Firefox 7, Chrome 20, etc.
• Undefined is still changeable in: Chrome 14, ...

When I recently integrated Facebook Connect with Tersus, I initially received the error messages Invalid Enumeration Value and Handler already exists when trying to call Facebook API functions.

It turned out that the cause of the problem was

object.x === undefined

returning false when there is no property 'x' in 'object'.

I worked around the problem by replacing strict equality with regular equality in two Facebook functions:

FB.Sys.isUndefined = function(o) { return o == undefined;};
FB.Sys.containsKey = function(d, key) { return d[key] != undefined;};

This made things work for me, but seems to hint at some sort of collision between Facebook's JavaScript code and my own.

What could cause this?

Hint: It is well documented that undefined == null while undefined !== null. This is not the issue here. The question is how comes we get undefined !== undefined.

NOTE: As per ECMAScript5.1, section 15.1.1.3, window.undefined is read-only.

• Modern browsers implement this correctly. for example: Safari 5.1, Firefox 7, Chrome 20, etc.
• Undefined is still changeable in: Chrome 14, ...

When I recently integrated Facebook Connect with Tersus, I initially received the error messages Invalid Enumeration Value and Handler already exists when trying to call Facebook API functions.

It turned out that the cause of the problem was

object.x === undefined

returning false when there is no property 'x' in 'object'.

I worked around the problem by replacing strict equality with regular equality in two Facebook functions:

FB.Sys.isUndefined = function(o) { return o == undefined;};
FB.Sys.containsKey = function(d, key) { return d[key] != undefined;};

This made things work for me, but seems to hint at some sort of collision between Facebook's JavaScript code and my own.

What could cause this?

Hint: It is well documented that undefined == null while undefined !== null. This is not the issue here. The question is how comes we get undefined !== undefined.

• javascript

Share Improve this question Follow edited Mar 9, 2014 at 10:16 Peter Mortensen 31.6k2222 gold badges109109 silver badges133133 bronze badges asked Apr 22, 2009 at 12:23 Youval BronickiYouval Bronicki 1,94222 gold badges1818 silver badges1818 bronze badges 3

• 5 Interesting, I just tried in my console. var a = {}; a.b === undefined //true. Are you sure your object.x === undefined returning false was because there was no field x in object? – Grace Huang Commented Sep 26, 2011 at 21:00
• 1 " As per ECMAScript5.1, section 15.1.1.3, window.undefined is read-only." - Horray, because in previous version someone could overwrite undefined globally, and everything would break :( – Dan Commented Jun 4, 2013 at 9:01
• Prior to window.undefined being read-only, void(0) was considered the standard extra-safe way to get your hands on the undefined value if you didn't want to trust you're environment's undefined variable. MDN – snarf Commented Jan 3, 2020 at 3:21

Add a comment  | 

7 Answers 7

Sorted by: Reset to default 92

The problem is that undefined compared to null using == gives true. The common check for undefined is therefore done like this:

typeof x == "undefined"

this ensures the type of the variable is really undefined.

It turns out that you can set window.undefined to whatever you want, and so get object.x !== undefined when object.x is the real undefined. In my case I inadvertently set undefined to null.

The easiest way to see this happen is:

window.undefined = null;
alert(window.xyzw === undefined); // shows false

Of course, this is not likely to happen. In my case the bug was a little more subtle, and was equivalent to the following scenario.

var n = window.someName; // someName expected to be set but is actually undefined
window[n]=null; // I thought I was clearing the old value but was actually changing window.undefined to null
alert(window.xyzw === undefined); // shows false

I'd like to post some important information about undefined, which beginners might not know.

Look at the following code:

 /* 
  * Consider there is no code above. 
  * The browser runs these lines only.
  */

   // var a;  
   // --- commented out to point that we've forgotten to declare `a` variable 

   if ( a === undefined ) {
       alert('Not defined');
   } else {
       alert('Defined: ' + a);
   }

   alert('Doing important job below');

If you run this code, where variable a HAS NEVER BEEN DECLARED using var, you will get an ERROR EXCEPTION and surprisingly see no alerts at all.

Instead of 'Doing important job below', your script will TERMINATE UNEXPECTEDLY, throwing unhandled exception on the very first line.

---

Here is the only bulletproof way to check for undefined using typeof keyword, which was designed just for such purpose:

   /* 
    * Correct and safe way of checking for `undefined`: 
    */

   if ( typeof a === 'undefined' ) {
       alert(
           'The variable is not declared in this scope, \n' +
           'or you are pointing to unexisting property, \n' +
           'or no value has been set yet to the variable, \n' + 
           'or the value set was `undefined`. \n' +
           '(two last cases are equivalent, don\'t worry if it blows out your mind.'
           );
   }

   /* 
    *  Use `typeof` for checking things like that
    */

This method works in all possible cases.

The last argument to use it is that undefined can be potentially overwritten in earlier versions of Javascript:

     /* @ Trollface @ */
        undefined = 2;
     /* Happy debuging! */  

Hope I was clear enough.

That's a bad practice to use the == equality operator instead of ===.

undefined === undefined // true
null == undefined // true
null === undefined // false

The object.x === undefined should return true if x is unknown property.

In chapter Bad Parts of JavaScript: The Good Parts, Crockford writes the following:

If you attempt to extract a value from an object, and if the object does not have a member with that name, it returns the undefined value instead.

In addition to undefined, JavaScript has a similar value called null. They are so similar that == thinks they are equal. That confuses some programmers into thinking that they are interchangeable, leading to code like

value = myObject[name];
if (value == null) {
    alert(name + ' not found.');
}

It is comparing the wrong value with the wrong operator. This code works because it contains two errors that cancel each other out. That is a crazy way to program. It is better written like this:

value = myObject[name];
if (value === undefined) {
    alert(name + ' not found.');
}

From - JQuery_Core_Style_Guidelines

• Global Variables:
  typeof variable === "undefined"

• Local Variables:
  variable === undefined

• Properties:
  object.prop === undefined

var a;

typeof a === 'undefined'; // true
a === undefined; // true
typeof a === typeof undefined; // true
typeof a === typeof sdfuwehflj; // true

A). I never have and never will trust any tool which purports to produce code without the user coding, which goes double where it's a graphical tool.

B). I've never had any problem with this with Facebook Connect. It's all still plain old JavaScript code running in a browser and undefined===undefined wherever you are.

In short, you need to provide evidence that your object.x really really was undefined and not null or otherwise, because I believe it is impossible for what you're describing to actually be the case - no offence :) - I'd put money on the problem existing in the Tersus code.

本文标签： JavaScript undefinedundefinedStack Overflow