admin管理员组

文章数量:1134599

Are there any benefits in using useMemo (e.g. for an intensive function call) instead of using a combination of useEffect and useState?

Here are two custom hooks that work exactly the same on first sight, besides useMemo's return value being null on the first render:

useEffect & useState

import { expensiveCalculation } from "foo";

function useCalculate(someNumber: number): number | null {
  const [result, setResult] = useState<number | null>(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    setResult(expensiveCalculation(someNumber));
  }, [someNumber]);

  return result;
}

useMemo

import { expensiveCalculation } from "foo";

function useCalculateWithMemo(someNumber: number): number {
    return useMemo(() => {
        return expensiveCalculation(someNumber);
    }, [someNumber]);
};

Both calculate the result each time their parameter someNumber changes, where is the memoization of useMemo kicking in?

Are there any benefits in using useMemo (e.g. for an intensive function call) instead of using a combination of useEffect and useState?

Here are two custom hooks that work exactly the same on first sight, besides useMemo's return value being null on the first render:

useEffect & useState

import { expensiveCalculation } from "foo";

function useCalculate(someNumber: number): number | null {
  const [result, setResult] = useState<number | null>(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    setResult(expensiveCalculation(someNumber));
  }, [someNumber]);

  return result;
}

useMemo

import { expensiveCalculation } from "foo";

function useCalculateWithMemo(someNumber: number): number {
    return useMemo(() => {
        return expensiveCalculation(someNumber);
    }, [someNumber]);
};

Both calculate the result each time their parameter someNumber changes, where is the memoization of useMemo kicking in?

Share Improve this question edited Dec 2, 2022 at 14:42 Bennett Dams asked May 7, 2019 at 18:58 Bennett DamsBennett Dams 7,0236 gold badges28 silver badges47 bronze badges 2
  • 1 The first will be null on the first render, while the second won't? – Jonas Wilms Commented May 7, 2019 at 19:08
  • 1 Are there any benefits in using useMemo (e. g. for an intensive function call) - yes. You're using a hook that was designed specifically for this purpose. The example you listed is most common real world example for useMemo. – Estus Flask Commented May 7, 2019 at 19:42
Add a comment  | 

4 Answers 4

Reset to default 232

The useEffect and setState will cause extra renders on every change: the first render will "lag behind" with stale data and then it'll immediately queue up an additional render with the new data.


Suppose we have:

// Maybe I'm running this on a literal potato
function expensiveCalculation(x) { return x + 1; };

Lets suppose x is initially 0:

  • The useMemo version immediately renders 1.
  • The useEffect version renders null, then after the component renders the effect runs, changes the state, and queues up a new render with 1.

Then if we change x to 2:

  • The useMemo runs and 3 is rendered.
  • The useEffect version runs, and renders 1 again, then the effect triggers and the component reruns with the correct value of 3.

In terms of how often expensiveCalculation runs, the two have identical behavior, but the useEffect version is causing twice as much rendering which is bad for performance for other reasons.

Plus, the useMemo version is just cleaner and more readable, IMO. It doesn't introduce unnecessary mutable state and has fewer moving parts.

So you're better off just using useMemo here.

I think there are two main points you should consider when choosing between them.

  1. Time when function called.

useEffect called after component has been rendered, so you can access DOM from it. For example, this is important if you want to access DOM elements via refs.

  1. Semantic guarantees.

useEffect guarantees that it will not be fired if dependencies have not changed. useMemo does not give such guarantees.

As stated in the React documentation, you should consider useMemo as pure optimization technique. Your program should continue to work correctly even if you replace useMemo with regular function call.

useEffect + useState can be used to control updates. Even to break-up circular dependencies and prevent infinite update loops.

I would say other than the async nature, there might be some difference in terms how they are designed.

useEffect is a collective call, async or not, it's collected after all components are rendered.

useMemo is a local call, which has only something to do with this component. You could just think of useMemo as another assignment statement with benefits to use the assignment from last update.

This means, useMemo is more urgent, and then useLayoutEffect and the last being useEffect.

useState + useEffect is not necessarily a good pattern.

const [state, setState] = useState(initialValue)

provides you with setState to explicitly change the state. In your example, call setState where some change to someNumber is made instead of using useEffect.

I know, this is not always possible. E.g. someNumber might belong to some outer context and changes are not made by the parent component but by siblings or cousins.

In case it's a child component that causes a change to someNumber, passing down setState to the child as prop isn't the worst idea.

Before slapping useEffect on useState, consider changes to your component tree. For an expensive calculation within some component, you can use simple Javascript laziness to make sure, the calculation won't happen on every re-render:

const [state, setState] = useState(() => { return /* expensive calculation */ })
                                   ^^^^^ lazy

As pointed out in a comment by @mark-adamson, when you want to display some component before the expensive calculation (e.g. with a spinner), you need useState, e.g. with a nullable state, because the absence of the result of the calculation is a legitimate state and needs some representation.

useEffect is still optional even in this case.

本文标签: javascriptuseMemo vs useEffectuseStateStack Overflow