admin管理员组文章数量:1129024
In JavaScript, why does isNaN(" ")
evaluate to false
, but isNaN(" x")
evaluate to true
?
I’m performing numerical operations on a text input field, and I’m checking if the field is null
, ""
, or NaN
. When someone types a handful of spaces into the field, my validation fails on all three, and I’m confused as to why it gets past the isNaN
check.
In JavaScript, why does isNaN(" ")
evaluate to false
, but isNaN(" x")
evaluate to true
?
I’m performing numerical operations on a text input field, and I’m checking if the field is null
, ""
, or NaN
. When someone types a handful of spaces into the field, my validation fails on all three, and I’m confused as to why it gets past the isNaN
check.
25 Answers
Reset to default 188JavaScript interprets an empty string as a 0, which then fails the isNAN test. You can use parseInt on the string first which won't convert the empty string to 0. The result should then fail isNAN.
You may find this surprising or maybe not, but here is some test code to show you the wackyness of the JavaScript engine.
document.write(isNaN("")) // false
document.write(isNaN(" ")) // false
document.write(isNaN(0)) // false
document.write(isNaN(null)) // false
document.write(isNaN(false)) // false
document.write("" == false) // true
document.write("" == 0) // true
document.write(" " == 0) // true
document.write(" " == false) // true
document.write(0 == false) // true
document.write(" " == "") // false
so this means that
" " == 0 == false
and
"" == 0 == false
but
"" != " "
Have fun :)
To understand it better, please open Ecma-Script spec pdf on page 43 "ToNumber Applied to the String Type"
if a string has a numerical syntax, which can contain any number of white-space characters, it can be converted to Number type. Empty string evaluates to 0. Also the string 'Infinity' should give
isNaN('Infinity'); // false
Try using:
alert(isNaN(parseInt(" ")));
Or
alert(isNaN(parseFloat(" ")));
From MDN
reason for the issue you are facing
When the argument to the isNaN function is not of type Number, the value is first coerced to a Number. The resulting value is then tested to determine whether it is NaN.
You may want to check the following comprehensive answer which covers the NaN comparison for equality as well.
How to test if a JavaScript variable is
NaN
I think it's because of Javascript's typing: ' '
is converted to zero, whereas 'x'
isn't:
alert(' ' * 1); // 0
alert('x' * 1); // NaN
The Not-Entirely-Correct Answer
Antonio Haley's highly upvoted and accepted answer here makes a wrong assumption that this process goes through JavaScript's parseInt
function:
You can use parseInt on the string ... The result should then fail isNAN.
We can easily disprove this statement with the string "123abc"
:
parseInt("123abc") // 123 (a number...
isNaN("123abc") // true ...which is not a number)
With this, we can see that JavaScript's parseInt
function returns "123abc"
as the number 123
, yet its isNaN
function tells us that "123abc"
isn't a number.
The Correct Answer
ECMAScript-262 defines how the isNaN
check works in section 18.2.3.
18.2.3
isNaN
(Number)The
isNaN
function is the%isNaN%
intrinsic object. When theisNaN
function is called with one argument number, the following steps are taken:
- Let
num
be ?ToNumber(number)
.- If
num
isNaN
, returntrue
.- Otherwise, return
false
.
The ToNumber
function it references is also defined in ECMAScript-262's section 7.1.3. In here, we get told how JavaScript handles Strings which are passed in to this function.
The first example given in the question is a string containing nothing but white space characters. This section states that:
A
StringNumericLiteral
that is empty or contains only white space is converted to+0
.
The " "
example string is therefore converted to +0
, which is a number.
The same section also states:
If the grammar cannot interpret the
String
as an expansion ofStringNumericLiteral
, then the result ofToNumber
isNaN
.
Without quoting all of the checks contained within that section, the " x"
example given in the question falls into the above condition as it cannot be interpreted as a StringNumericLiteral
. " x"
is therefore converted to NaN
.
The function isNaN("")
performs a String to Number type coercion
ECMAScript 3-5 defines the following return values for the typeof operator:
- undefined
- object (null, objects, arrays)
- boolean
- number
- string
- function
Better to wrap our test in a function body:
function isNumber (s) {
return typeof s == 'number'? true
: typeof s == 'string'? (s.trim() === ''? false : !isNaN(s))
: (typeof s).match(/object|function/)? false
: !isNaN(s)
}
This function is not intented to test variable type, instead it tests the coerced value. For instance, booleans and strings are coerced to numbers, so perhaps you may want to call this function as isNumberCoerced()
if there's no need to test for types other than string and number, then the following snippet might be used as part of some condition:
if (!isNaN(s) && s.toString().trim()!='') // 's' can be boolean, number or string
alert("s is a number")
If you would like to implement an accurate isNumber function, here is one way to do it from Javascript: The Good Parts by Douglas Crockford [page 105]
var isNumber = function isNumber(value) {
return typeof value === 'number' &&
isFinite(value);
}
NaN
!== "not a number"
NaN
is a value of Number Type
this is a definition of isNaN() in ECMAScript
1. Let num be ToNumber(number).
2. ReturnIfAbrupt(num).
3. If num is NaN, return true.
4. Otherwise, return false.
Try to convert any value to Number.
Number(" ") // 0
Number("x") // NaN
Number(null) // 0
If you want to determine if the value is NaN
, you should try to convert it to a Number value firstly.
I suggest you to use the following function if you really want a proper check if it is an integer:
function isInteger(s)
{
return Math.ceil(s) == Math.floor(s);
}
That isNaN(" ")
is false is part of the confusing behavior of the isNaN
global function due to its coercion of non-numbers to a numeric type.
From MDN:
Since the very earliest versions of the
isNaN
function specification, its behavior for non-numeric arguments has been confusing. When the argument to theisNaN
function is not of type Number, the value is first coerced to a Number. The resulting value is then tested to determine whether it isNaN
. Thus for non-numbers that when coerced to numeric type result in a valid non-NaN numeric value (notably the empty string and boolean primitives, which when coerced give numeric values zero or one), the "false" returned value may be unexpected; the empty string, for example, is surely "not a number."
Note also that with ECMAScript 6, there is also now the Number.isNaN
method, which according to MDN:
In comparison to the global
isNaN()
function,Number.isNaN()
doesn't suffer the problem of forcefully converting the parameter to a number. This means it is now safe to pass values that would normally convert toNaN
, but aren't actually the same value asNaN
. This also means that only values of the type number, that are alsoNaN
, returntrue
.
Unfortunately:
Even the ECMAScript 6 Number.isNaN
method has its own issues, as outlined in the blog post - Fixing the ugly JavaScript and ES6 NaN problem.
The isNaN
function expects a Number as its argument, so arguments of any other type (in your case a string) will be converted to Number before the actual function logic is performed. (Be aware that NaN
is also a value of type Number!)
Btw. this is common for all built-in functions - if they expect an argument of a certain type, the actual argument will be converted using the standard conversion functions. There are standard conversions between all the basic types (bool, string, number, object, date, null, undefined.)
The standard conversion for String
to Number
can be invoked explicit with Number()
. So we can see that:
Number(" ")
evaluates to0
Number(" x")
evaluates toNaN
Given this, the result of the isNaN
function is completely logical!
The real question is why the standard String-to-Number conversion works like it does. The string-to-number conversion is really intended to convert numeric strings like "123" or "17.5e4" to the equivalent numbers. The conversion first skips initial whitespace (so " 123" is valid) and then tries to parse the rests as a number. If it is not parseable as a number ("x" isn't) then the result is NaN. But there is the explicit special rule that a string which is empty or only whitespace is converted to 0. So this explains the conversion.
Reference: http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-9.3.1
I'm not sure why, but to get around the problem you could always trim whitespace before checking. You probably want to do that anyway.
I wrote this quick little function to help solve this problem.
function isNumber(val) {
return (val != undefined && val != null && val.toString().length > 0 && val.toString().match(/[^0-9\.\-]/g) == null);
};
It simply checks for any characters that aren't numeric (0-9), that aren't '-' or '.', and that aren't undefined, null or empty and returns true if there's no matches. :)
As other explained the isNaN
function will coerce the empty string into a number before validating it, thus changing an empty string into 0 (which is a valid number).
However, I found that the parseInt
function will return NaN
when trying to parse an empty string or a string with only spaces. As such the following combination seems to be working well:
if ( isNaN(string) || isNaN(parseInt(string)) ) console.log('Not a number!');
This check will work for positive numbers, negative numbers and numbers with a decimal point, so I believe it covers all common numerical cases.
I use this
function isNotANumeric(val) {
if(val.trim && val.trim() == "") {
return true;
} else {
return isNaN(parseFloat(val * 1));
}
}
alert(isNotANumeric("100")); // false
alert(isNotANumeric("1a")); // true
alert(isNotANumeric("")); // true
alert(isNotANumeric(" ")); // true
This function seemed to work in my tests
function isNumber(s) {
if (s === "" || s === null) {
return false;
} else {
var number = parseInt(s);
if (number == 'NaN') {
return false;
} else {
return true;
}
}
}
What about
function isNumberRegex(value) {
var pattern = /^[-+]?\d*\.?\d*$/i;
var match = value.match(pattern);
return value.length > 0 && match != null;
}
The JavaScript built-in isNaN function, is - as should be expected by default - a "Dynamic Type Operator".
Therefore all values which (during the DTC process) may yield a simple true | false such as "", " ", " 000"
, cannot be NaN.
Meaning that the argument supplied will first undergo a conversion as in:
function isNaNDemo(arg){
var x = new Number(arg).valueOf();
return x != x;
}
Explanation:
In the top line of the function body, we are (first) trying to successfully convert the argument into a number object. And (second), using the dot operator we are - for our own convenience - immediately stripping off, the primitive value of the created object.
In the second line, we are taking the value obtained in the previous step, and the advantage of the fact that NaN is not equal to anything in the universe, not even to itself, e.g.: NaN == NaN >> false
to finally compare it (for inequality) with itself.
This way the function return will yield true only when, and only if, the supplied argument-return, is a failed attempt of conversion to a number object, i.e., a not-a-number number; e.g., NaN.
isNaNstatic( )
However, for a Static Type Operator - if needed and when needed - we can write a far simpler function such as:
function isNaNstatic(x){
return x != x;
}
And avoid the DTC altogether so that if the argument is not explicitly a NaN number, it will return false. Wherefore, testing against the following:
isNaNStatic(" x"); // will return false
because it's still a string.
However:
isNaNStatic(1/"x"); // will of course return true.
as will for instance isNaNStatic(NaN); >> true
.
But contrary to isNaN
, the isNaNStatic("NaN"); >> false
because it (the argument) is an ordinary string.
p.s.: The static version of isNaN can be very useful in modern coding scenarios. And it may very well be one of the main reasons I took my time for posting this.
Regards.
isNAN(<argument>)
is a function to tell whether given argument is illegal number.
isNaN
typecasts the arguments into Number type. If you want to check if argument is Numeric or not? Please use $.isNumeric()
function in jQuery.
That is, isNaN(foo) is equivalent to isNaN(Number(foo)) It accepts any strings having all numerals as numbers for obvious reasons. For ex.
isNaN(123) //false
isNaN(-1.23) //false
isNaN(5-2) //false
isNaN(0) //false
isNaN('123') //false
isNaN('Hello') //true
isNaN('2005/12/12') //true
isNaN('') //false
isNaN(true) //false
isNaN(undefined) //true
isNaN('NaN') //true
isNaN(NaN) //true
isNaN(0 / 0) //true
When checking if certain string value with whitespace or " "
is isNaN
maybe try to perform string validation, example :
// value = "123 "
if (value.match(/\s/) || isNaN(value)) {
// do something
}
I find it convenient to have a method specific to the Number class (since other functions that do conversions like parseInt have different outputs for some of these values) and use prototypal inheritance.
Object.assign(Number.prototype, {
isNumericallyValid(num) {
if (
num === null
|| typeof num === 'boolean'
|| num === ''
|| Number.isNaN(Number(num))
) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
});
I use the following.
x=(isNaN(parseFloat(x)))? 0.00 : parseFloat(x);
let isNotNumber = val => isNaN(val) || (val.trim && val.trim() === '');
console.log(isNotNumber(' '));
console.log(isNotNumber('1'));
console.log(isNotNumber('123x'));
console.log(isNotNumber('x123'));
console.log(isNotNumber('0'));
console.log(isNotNumber(3));
console.log(isNotNumber(' x'));
console.log(isNotNumber('1.23'));
console.log(isNotNumber('1.23.1.3'));
if(!isNotNumber(3)){
console.log('This is a number');
}
本文标签: javascriptWhy does isNaN(quot quot) (string with spaces) equal falseStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - Why does isNaN(" ") (string with spaces) equal false? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1736713882a1949091.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
"" == false // true
andisNaN(" ") // false
– João Pimentel Ferreira Commented Apr 30, 2019 at 10:48Number.isNaN
instead. – Sebastian Simon Commented Jun 30, 2021 at 14:51