admin管理员组文章数量:1129449
Let's suppose I wanted a sort function that returns a sorted copy of the inputted array. I naively tried this
function sort(arr) {
return arr.sort();
}
and I tested it with this, which shows that my sort
method is mutating the array.
var a = [2,3,7,5,3,7,1,3,4];
sort(a);
alert(a); //alerts "1,2,3,3,3,4,5,7,7"
I also tried this approach
function sort(arr) {
return Array.prototype.sort(arr);
}
but it doesn't work at all.
Is there a straightforward way around this, preferably a way that doesn't require hand-rolling my own sorting algorithm or copying every element of the array into a new one?
Let's suppose I wanted a sort function that returns a sorted copy of the inputted array. I naively tried this
function sort(arr) {
return arr.sort();
}
and I tested it with this, which shows that my sort
method is mutating the array.
var a = [2,3,7,5,3,7,1,3,4];
sort(a);
alert(a); //alerts "1,2,3,3,3,4,5,7,7"
I also tried this approach
function sort(arr) {
return Array.prototype.sort(arr);
}
but it doesn't work at all.
Is there a straightforward way around this, preferably a way that doesn't require hand-rolling my own sorting algorithm or copying every element of the array into a new one?
Share Improve this question edited Feb 11, 2022 at 15:38 danronmoon 3,8735 gold badges35 silver badges58 bronze badges asked Mar 6, 2012 at 22:11 Peter OlsonPeter Olson 143k49 gold badges208 silver badges248 bronze badges 5 |12 Answers
Reset to default 546With the introduction of the new .toSorted
method in JavaScript, there's now a straightforward way to get a sorted copy of the array without modifying the original array:
const sorted = arr.toSorted();
For more details, you can refer to the MDN documentation on .toSorted
.
Note: Before using .toSorted
, make sure to check the compatibility with your environment. This method requires Node.js >= 20.0.0 or a recent version of modern browsers. If you are working in an environment that does not support this version, you may need to use the older method below.
For completeness, here's the older method using ES6 spread syntax to create a copy before sorting:
const sorted = [...arr].sort();
The spread-syntax as array literal (copied from MDN):
const arr = [1, 2, 3];
const arr2 = [...arr]; // like arr.slice()
Just copy the array. There are many ways to do that:
function sort(arr) {
return arr.concat().sort();
}
// Or:
return Array.prototype.slice.call(arr).sort(); // For array-like objects
Try the following
function sortCopy(arr) {
return arr.slice(0).sort();
}
The slice(0)
expression creates a copy of the array starting at element 0.
You can use slice with no arguments to copy an array:
var foo,
bar;
foo = [3,1,2];
bar = foo.slice().sort();
ES2023 Array Method toSorted():
The
toSorted()
method ofArray
instances is the copying version of thesort()
method. It returns a new array with the elements sorted in ascending order.
const arr = [2, 1, 3];
const arrSorted = arr.toSorted();
console.log(arr); //[2, 1, 3]
console.log(arrSorted); //[1, 2, 3]
You can also do this
d = [20, 30, 10]
e = Array.from(d)
e.sort()
This way d will not get mutated.
function sorted(arr) {
temp = Array.from(arr)
return temp.sort()
}
//Use it like this
x = [20, 10, 100]
console.log(sorted(x))
Update - Array.prototype.toSorted()
proposal
The Array.prototype.toSorted(compareFn) -> Array
is a new method that was proposed to be added to the Array.prototype
and is currently in stage 3 (Soon to be available).
This method will keep the target Array untouched and return a copy with the change performed instead.
Remember that if no argument is passed to sort
, it will not properly sort numbers by value. For numbers, try this. This does not mutate the original array.
function sort(arr) {
return arr.slice(0).sort((a,b) => a-b);
}
Anyone who wants to do a deep copy (e.g. if your array contains objects) can use:
let arrCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr))
Then you can sort arrCopy
without changing arr
.
arrCopy.sort((obj1, obj2) => obj1.id > obj2.id)
Please note: this can be slow for very large arrays.
There's a new tc39 proposal, which adds a toSorted
method to Array
that returns a copy of the array and doesn't modify the original.
For example:
const sequence = [3, 2, 1];
sequence.toSorted(); // => [1, 2, 3]
sequence; // => [3, 2, 1]
As it's currently in stage 3, it will likely be implemented in browser engines soon, but in the meantime a polyfill is available here or in core-js
.
You can also extend the existing Array functionality. This allows chaining different array functions together.
Array.prototype.sorted = function (compareFn) {
const shallowCopy = this.slice();
shallowCopy.sort(compareFn);
return shallowCopy;
}
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
.filter(x => x % 2 == 0)
.sorted((l, r) => r - l)
.map(x => x * 2)
// -> [12, 8, 4]
Same in typescript:
// extensions.ts
Array.prototype.sorted = function (compareFn?: ((a: any, b: any) => number) | undefined) {
const shallowCopy = this.slice();
shallowCopy.sort(compareFn);
return shallowCopy;
}
declare global {
interface Array<T> {
sorted(compareFn?: (a: T, b: T) => number): Array<T>;
}
}
export {}
// index.ts
import 'extensions.ts';
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
.filter(x => x % 2 == 0)
.sorted((l, r) => r - l)
.map(x => x * 2)
// -> [12, 8, 4]
To sort a function without mutating the original, simply use .map()
before sort to create a copy of the original array:
const originalArr = [1, 45, 3, 21, 6];
const sortedArr = originalArr.map(value => JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(value))).sort((a, b) => a - b);
console.log(sortedArr); // the logged output will be 1,3,6,21,45
The original array has not been modified, but you have a sorted version of it available to you. JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())
make sure it is a deep copy, not a shallow copy.
本文标签: javascriptHow can you sort an array without mutating the original arrayStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:javascript - How can you sort an array without mutating the original array? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1736690495a1947900.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
.sort
requires thethis
value to be the array, so for the last snippet to work you would do.sort.call(arr)
(though it doesn't solve your problem). – pimvdb Commented Mar 6, 2012 at 22:15