admin管理员组

文章数量:1125559

I'm having a hard time figuring out how to move an element of an array. For example, given the following:

var array = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];

How can I write a function to move the element 'd' to the left of 'b' ?

Or 'a' to the right of 'c'?

After moving the elements, the indexes of the rest of the elements should be updated. The resulting array would be:

array = ['a', 'd', 'b', 'c', 'e']

This seems like it should be pretty simple, but I can't wrap my head around it.

I'm having a hard time figuring out how to move an element of an array. For example, given the following:

var array = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];

How can I write a function to move the element 'd' to the left of 'b' ?

Or 'a' to the right of 'c'?

After moving the elements, the indexes of the rest of the elements should be updated. The resulting array would be:

array = ['a', 'd', 'b', 'c', 'e']

This seems like it should be pretty simple, but I can't wrap my head around it.

• javascript
• arrays

Share Improve this question Follow edited Jan 7, 2022 at 7:55 Gass 9,28855 gold badges4646 silver badges5151 bronze badges asked Mar 15, 2011 at 1:57 Mark BrownMark Brown 12.5k88 gold badges2929 silver badges3232 bronze badges 3

• using ES6 const changeValuePosition = (arr, init, target) => {[arr[init],arr[target]] = [arr[target],arr[init]]; return arr} – principiorum Commented May 18, 2020 at 3:24
• 5 That just swaps the elements at init and target. – user4945014 Commented May 24, 2020 at 18:49
• @user4945014 It's not just swapping. If a swap occurs, the OP would get array = ['a', 'd', 'c', 'b', 'e'], which would mean 'c' and 'b' would be in the wrong order. An insert and shift as he's looking for will keep 'b' and 'c' in the same order. – John Commented May 1, 2022 at 17:41

Add a comment  | 

48 Answers 48

Sorted by: Reset to default 1 2 Next 898 +150

If you'd like a version on npm, array-move is the closest to this answer, although it's not the same implementation. See its usage section for more details. The previous version of this answer (that modified Array.prototype.move) can be found on npm at array.prototype.move.

---

I had fairly good success with this function:

function array_move(arr, old_index, new_index) {
    if (new_index >= arr.length) {
        var k = new_index - arr.length + 1;
        while (k--) {
            arr.push(undefined);
        }
    }
    arr.splice(new_index, 0, arr.splice(old_index, 1)[0]);
    return arr; // for testing
};

// returns [2, 1, 3]
console.log(array_move([1, 2, 3], 0, 1)); 

Note that the last return is simply for testing purposes: splice performs operations on the array in-place, so a return is not necessary. By extension, this move is an in-place operation. If you want to avoid that and return a copy, use slice.

Stepping through the code:

1. If new_index is greater than the length of the array, we want (I presume) to pad the array properly with new undefineds. This little snippet handles this by pushing undefined on the array until we have the proper length.
2. Then, in arr.splice(old_index, 1)[0], we splice out the old element. splice returns the element that was spliced out, but it's in an array. In our above example, this was [1]. So we take the first index of that array to get the raw 1 there.
3. Then we use splice to insert this element in the new_index's place. Since we padded the array above if new_index > arr.length, it will probably appear in the right place, unless they've done something strange like pass in a negative number.

A fancier version to account for negative indices:

function array_move(arr, old_index, new_index) {
    while (old_index < 0) {
        old_index += arr.length;
    }
    while (new_index < 0) {
        new_index += arr.length;
    }
    if (new_index >= arr.length) {
        var k = new_index - arr.length + 1;
        while (k--) {
            arr.push(undefined);
        }
    }
    arr.splice(new_index, 0, arr.splice(old_index, 1)[0]);
    return arr; // for testing purposes
};
    
// returns [1, 3, 2]
console.log(array_move([1, 2, 3], -1, -2));

Which should account for things like array_move([1, 2, 3], -1, -2) properly (move the last element to the second to last place). Result for that should be [1, 3, 2].

Either way, in your original question, you would do array_move(arr, 0, 2) for a after c. For d before b, you would do array_move(arr, 3, 1).

I like this method as it's concise and it just works.

function arraymove(arr, fromIndex, toIndex) {
    var element = arr[fromIndex];
    arr.splice(fromIndex, 1);
    arr.splice(toIndex, 0, element);
}

Note: always remember to check your array bounds.

The following snippet prints a few tests in console to show all combinations of fromIndex and toIndex (0..n, 0..n) work.

Run Snippet in jsFiddle

Here's a one liner I found on JSPerf....

Array.prototype.move = function(from, to) {
    this.splice(to, 0, this.splice(from, 1)[0]);
};

which is awesome to read, but if you want performance (in small data sets) try...

 Array.prototype.move2 = function(pos1, pos2) {
    // local variables
    var i, tmp;
    // cast input parameters to integers
    pos1 = parseInt(pos1, 10);
    pos2 = parseInt(pos2, 10);
    // if positions are different and inside array
    if (pos1 !== pos2 && 0 <= pos1 && pos1 <= this.length && 0 <= pos2 && pos2 <= this.length) {
      // save element from position 1
      tmp = this[pos1];
      // move element down and shift other elements up
      if (pos1 < pos2) {
        for (i = pos1; i < pos2; i++) {
          this[i] = this[i + 1];
        }
      }
      // move element up and shift other elements down
      else {
        for (i = pos1; i > pos2; i--) {
          this[i] = this[i - 1];
        }
      }
      // put element from position 1 to destination
      this[pos2] = tmp;
    }
  }

I can't take any credit, it should all go to Richard Scarrott. It beats the splice based method for smaller data sets in this performance test. It is however significantly slower on larger data sets as Darwayne points out.

The splice() method adds/removes items to/from an array, and returns the removed item(s).

Note: This method changes the original array. /w3schools/

Array.prototype.move = function(from,to){
  this.splice(to,0,this.splice(from,1)[0]);
  return this;
};

var arr = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
arr.move(3,1);//["a", "d", "b", "c", "e"]


var arr = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
arr.move(0,2);//["b", "c", "a", "d", "e"]

as the function is chainable this works too:

alert(arr.move(0,2).join(','));

demo here

My 2c. Easy to read, it works, it's fast, it doesn't create new arrays.

function move(array, from, to) {
  if( to === from ) return array;

  var target = array[from];                         
  var increment = to < from ? -1 : 1;

  for(var k = from; k != to; k += increment){
    array[k] = array[k + increment];
  }
  array[to] = target;
  return array;
}

Here is my one liner ES6 solution with an optional parameter on.

if (typeof Array.prototype.move === "undefined") {
  Array.prototype.move = function(from, to, on = 1) {
    this.splice(to, 0, ...this.splice(from, on))
  }
}

Adaptation of the first solution proposed by digiguru

The parameter on is the number of element starting from from you want to move.

Here is a chainable variation of this:

if (typeof Array.prototype.move === "undefined") {
  Array.prototype.move = function(from, to, on = 1) {
    return this.splice(to, 0, ...this.splice(from, on)), this
  }
}

[3, 4, 5, 1, 2].move(3, 0, 2) // => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

If you'd like to avoid prototype pollution, here's a stand-alone function:

function move(array, from, to, on = 1) {
  return array.splice(to, 0, ...array.splice(from, on)), array
}

move([3, 4, 5, 1, 2], 3, 0, 2) // => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

And finally, here's a pure function that doesn't mutate the original array:

function moved(array, from, to, on = 1) {
  return array = array.slice(), array.splice(to, 0, ...array.splice(from, on)), array
}

This should cover basically every variation seen in every other answer.

Got this idea from @Reid of pushing something in the place of the item that is supposed to be moved to keep the array size constant. That does simplify calculations. Also, pushing an empty object has the added benefits of being able to search for it uniquely later on. This works because two objects are not equal until they are referring to the same object.

({}) == ({}); // false

So here's the function which takes in the source array, and the source, destination indexes. You could add it to the Array.prototype if needed.

function moveObjectAtIndex(array, sourceIndex, destIndex) {
    var placeholder = {};
    // remove the object from its initial position and
    // plant the placeholder object in its place to
    // keep the array length constant
    var objectToMove = array.splice(sourceIndex, 1, placeholder)[0];
    // place the object in the desired position
    array.splice(destIndex, 0, objectToMove);
    // take out the temporary object
    array.splice(array.indexOf(placeholder), 1);
}

This is based on @Reid's solution. Except:

• I'm not changing the Array prototype.
• Moving an item out of bounds to the right does not create undefined items, it just moves the item to the right-most position.

Function:

function move(array, oldIndex, newIndex) {
    if (newIndex >= array.length) {
        newIndex = array.length - 1;
    }
    array.splice(newIndex, 0, array.splice(oldIndex, 1)[0]);
    return array;
}

Unit tests:

describe('ArrayHelper', function () {
    it('Move right', function () {
        let array = [1, 2, 3];
        arrayHelper.move(array, 0, 1);
        assert.equal(array[0], 2);
        assert.equal(array[1], 1);
        assert.equal(array[2], 3);
    })
    it('Move left', function () {
        let array = [1, 2, 3];
        arrayHelper.move(array, 1, 0);
        assert.equal(array[0], 2);
        assert.equal(array[1], 1);
        assert.equal(array[2], 3);
    });
    it('Move out of bounds to the left', function () {
        let array = [1, 2, 3];
        arrayHelper.move(array, 1, -2);
        assert.equal(array[0], 2);
        assert.equal(array[1], 1);
        assert.equal(array[2], 3);
    });
    it('Move out of bounds to the right', function () {
        let array = [1, 2, 3];
        arrayHelper.move(array, 1, 4);
        assert.equal(array[0], 1);
        assert.equal(array[1], 3);
        assert.equal(array[2], 2);
    });
});

You can implement some basic calculus and create a universal function for moving array elements from one position to the other.

For JavaScript it looks like this:

function magicFunction (targetArray, indexFrom, indexTo) { 

    targetElement = targetArray[indexFrom]; 
    magicIncrement = (indexTo - indexFrom) / Math.abs (indexTo - indexFrom); 

    for (Element = indexFrom; Element != indexTo; Element += magicIncrement){ 
        targetArray[Element] = targetArray[Element + magicIncrement]; 
    } 

    targetArray[indexTo] = targetElement; 

}

Check out "moving array elements" at "Gloommatter" for detailed explanation.

https://web.archive.org/web/20121105042534/http://www.gloommatter.com:80/DDesign/programming/moving-any-array-elements-universal-function.html

I've implemented an immutable ECMAScript 6 solution based off of @Merc's answer over here:

const moveItemInArrayFromIndexToIndex = (array, fromIndex, toIndex) => {
  if (fromIndex === toIndex) return array;

  const newArray = [...array];

  const target = newArray[fromIndex];
  const inc = toIndex < fromIndex ? -1 : 1;

  for (let i = fromIndex; i !== toIndex; i += inc) {
    newArray[i] = newArray[i + inc];
  }

  newArray[toIndex] = target;

  return newArray;
};

The variable names can be shortened, just used long ones so that the code can explain itself.

In 2022, this typescript utility will work along with a unit test.

export const arrayMove = <T>(arr: T[], fromIndex: number, toIndex: number) => {
  const newArr = [...arr];
  newArr.splice(toIndex, 0, newArr.splice(fromIndex, 1)[0]);
  return newArr;
};

const testArray = ['1', '2', '3', '4'];

describe('arrayMove', () => {
  it('should move array item to toIndex', () => {
    expect(arrayMove(testArray, 2, 0)).toEqual(['3', '1', '2', '4']);
    expect(arrayMove(testArray, 3, 1)).toEqual(['1', '4', '2', '3']);
    expect(arrayMove(testArray, 1, 2)).toEqual(['1', '3', '2', '4']);
    expect(arrayMove(testArray, 0, 2)).toEqual(['2', '3', '1', '4']);
  });
});

One approach would be to use splice() to remove the item from the array and then by using splice() method again, insert the removed item into the target index.

const array = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']

const newArray = moveItem(array, 3, 1) // move element from index 3 to index 1

function moveItem(arr, fromIndex, toIndex){
  let itemRemoved = arr.splice(fromIndex, 1) // assign the removed item as an array
  arr.splice(toIndex, 0, itemRemoved[0]) // insert itemRemoved into the target index
  return arr
}

console.log(newArray)

You can find a short explanation of splice() here

One approach would be to create a new array with the pieces in the order you want, using the slice method.

Example

var arr = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
var arr2 = arr.slice(0,1).concat( ['d'] ).concat( arr.slice(2,4) ).concat( arr.slice(4) );

• arr.slice(0,1) gives you ['a']
• arr.slice(2,4) gives you ['b', 'c']
• arr.slice(4) gives you ['e']

Another pure JS variant using ES6 array spread operator with no mutation

const reorder = (array, sourceIndex, destinationIndex) => {
	const smallerIndex = Math.min(sourceIndex, destinationIndex);
	const largerIndex = Math.max(sourceIndex, destinationIndex);

	return [
		...array.slice(0, smallerIndex),
		...(sourceIndex < destinationIndex
			? array.slice(smallerIndex + 1, largerIndex + 1)
			: []),
		array[sourceIndex],
		...(sourceIndex > destinationIndex
			? array.slice(smallerIndex, largerIndex)
			: []),
		...array.slice(largerIndex + 1),
	];
}

// returns ['a', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'b', 'f']
console.log(reorder(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f'], 1, 4))
      
 

The splice method of Array might help: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/splice

Just keep in mind it might be relatively expensive since it has to actively re-index the array.

I needed an immutable move method (one that didn't change the original array), so I adapted @Reid's accepted answer to simply use Object.assign to create a copy of the array before doing the splice.

Array.prototype.immutableMove = function (old_index, new_index) {
  var copy = Object.assign([], this);
  if (new_index >= copy.length) {
      var k = new_index - copy.length;
      while ((k--) + 1) {
          copy.push(undefined);
      }
  }
  copy.splice(new_index, 0, copy.splice(old_index, 1)[0]);
  return copy;
};

Here is a jsfiddle showing it in action.

TypeScript Version

Copied from @Merc's answer. I like that one best because it is not creating new arrays and modifies the array in place. All I did was update to ES6 and add the types.

export function moveItemInArray<T>(workArray: T[], fromIndex: number, toIndex: number): T[] {
    if (toIndex === fromIndex) {
        return workArray;
    }
    const target = workArray[fromIndex];
    const increment = toIndex < fromIndex ? -1 : 1;

    for (let k = fromIndex; k !== toIndex; k += increment) {
        workArray[k] = workArray[k + increment];
    }
    workArray[toIndex] = target;
    return workArray;
}

    Array.prototype.moveUp = function (value, by) {
        var index = this.indexOf(value),
            newPos = index - (by || 1);

        if (index === -1)
            throw new Error("Element not found in array");

        if (newPos < 0)
            newPos = 0;

        this.splice(index, 1);
        this.splice(newPos, 0, value);
    };

    Array.prototype.moveDown = function (value, by) {
        var index = this.indexOf(value),
            newPos = index + (by || 1);

        if (index === -1)
            throw new Error("Element not found in array");

        if (newPos >= this.length)
            newPos = this.length;

        this.splice(index, 1);
        this.splice(newPos, 0, value);
    };



    var arr = ['banana', 'curyWurst', 'pc', 'remembaHaruMembaru'];

    alert('withiout changes= '+arr[0]+'  '+arr[1]+'  '+arr[2]+'  '+arr[3]);
    arr.moveDown(arr[2]);


    alert('third word moved down= '+arr[0] + '  ' + arr[1] + '  ' + arr[2] + '  ' + arr[3]);
    arr.moveUp(arr[2]);
    alert('third word moved up= '+arr[0] + '  ' + arr[1] + '  ' + arr[2] + '  ' + arr[3]);

http://plnkr.co/edit/JaiAaO7FQcdPGPY6G337?p=preview

Here's one way to do it in an immutable way. It handles negative numbers as well as an added bonus. This is reduces number of possible bugs at the cost of performance compared to editing the original array.

const numbers = [1, 2, 3];
const moveElement = (array, from, to) => {
  const copy = [...array];
  const valueToMove = copy.splice(from, 1)[0];
  copy.splice(to, 0, valueToMove);
  return copy;
};

console.log(moveElement(numbers, 0, 2))
// > [2, 3, 1]
console.log(moveElement(numbers, -1, -3))
// > [3, 1, 2] 

Find and move an element from "n"th position to 0th position.

Eg: Find and move 'd' to 0th position:

let arr = [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
arr = [...arr.filter(item => item === 'd'), ...arr.filter(item => item !== 'd')];
console.log(arr);

It is stated in many places (adding custom functions into Array.prototype) playing with the Array prototype could be a bad idea, anyway I combined the best from various posts, I came with this, using modern Javascript:

    Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'immutableMove', {
        enumerable: false,
        value: function (old_index, new_index) {
            var copy = Object.assign([], this)
            if (new_index >= copy.length) {
                var k = new_index - copy.length;
                while ((k--) + 1) { copy.push(undefined); }
            }
            copy.splice(new_index, 0, copy.splice(old_index, 1)[0]);
            return copy
        }
    });

    //how to use it
    myArray=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4];
    myArray=myArray.immutableMove(2, 4);
    console.log(myArray);
    //result: 0, 1, 3, 4, 2

Hope can be useful to anyone

This version isn't ideal for all purposes, and not everyone likes comma expressions, but here's a one-liner that's a pure expression, creating a fresh copy:

const move = (from, to, ...a) => (a.splice(to, 0, ...a.splice(from, 1)), a)

A slightly performance-improved version returns the input array if no move is needed, it's still OK for immutable use, as the array won't change, and it's still a pure expression:

const move = (from, to, ...a) => 
    from === to 
    ? a 
    : (a.splice(to, 0, ...a.splice(from, 1)), a)

The invocation of either is

const shuffled = move(fromIndex, toIndex, ...list)

i.e. it relies on spreading to generate a fresh copy. Using a fixed arity 3 move would jeopardize either the single expression property, or the non-destructive nature, or the performance benefit of splice. Again, it's more of an example that meets some criteria than a suggestion for production use.

const move = (from, to, ...a) =>from === to ? a : (a.splice(to, 0, ...a.splice(from, 1)), a);
const moved = move(0, 2, ...['a', 'b', 'c']);
console.log(moved)

I thought this was a swap problem but it's not. Here's my one-liner solution:

const move = (arr, from, to) => arr.map((item, i) => i === to ? arr[from] : (i >= Math.min(from, to) && i <= Math.max(from, to) ? arr[i + Math.sign(to - from)] : item));

Here's a small test:

let test = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
console.log(move(test, 0, 2)); // [ 'b', 'c', 'a', 'd', 'e' ]
console.log(move(test, 1, 3)); // [ 'a', 'c', 'd', 'b', 'e' ]
console.log(move(test, 2, 4)); // [ 'a', 'b', 'd', 'e', 'c' ]
console.log(move(test, 2, 0)); // [ 'c', 'a', 'b', 'd', 'e' ]
console.log(move(test, 3, 1)); // [ 'a', 'd', 'b', 'c', 'e' ]
console.log(move(test, 4, 2)); // [ 'a', 'b', 'e', 'c', 'd' ]
console.log(move(test, 4, 0)); // [ 'e', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd' ]

This is a really simple method using splice

Array.prototype.moveToStart = function(index) {
    this.splice(0, 0, this.splice(index, 1)[0]);
    return this;
  };

I love immutable, functional one liners :) ...

const swapIndex = (array, from, to) => (
  from < to 
    ? [...array.slice(0, from), ...array.slice(from + 1, to + 1), array[from], ...array.slice(to + 1)] 
    : [...array.slice(0, to), array[from], ...array.slice(to, from), ...array.slice(from + 1)]
);

I ended up combining two of these to work a little better when moving both small and large distances. I get fairly consistent results, but this could probably be tweaked a little bit by someone smarter than me to work differently for different sizes, etc.

Using some of the other methods when moving objects small distances was significantly faster (x10) than using splice. This might change depending on the array lengths though, but it is true for large arrays.

function ArrayMove(array, from, to) {
    if ( Math.abs(from - to) > 60) {
        array.splice(to, 0, array.splice(from, 1)[0]);
    } else {
        // works better when we are not moving things very far
        var target = array[from];
        var inc = (to - from) / Math.abs(to - from);
        var current = from;
        for (; current != to; current += inc) {
            array[current] = array[current + inc];
        }
        array[to] = target;    
    }
}

https://web.archive.org/web/20181026015711/https://jsperf.com/arraymove-many-sizes

Object oriented, expressive, debuggable, without mutation, tested.

class Sorter {
    sortItem(array, fromIndex, toIndex) {
        const reduceItems = () => {
            const startingItems = array.slice(0, fromIndex);
            const endingItems = array.slice(fromIndex + 1);
            return startingItems.concat(endingItems);
        }
        const addMovingItem = (movingItem, reducedItems) => {
            const startingNewItems = reducedItems.slice(0, toIndex);
            const endingNewItems = reducedItems.slice(toIndex);
            const newItems = startingNewItems.concat([movingItem]).concat(endingNewItems);
            return newItems;
        }
        const movingItem = array[fromIndex];
        const reducedItems = reduceItems();
        const newItems = addMovingItem(movingItem, reducedItems);
        return newItems;
    }
}

const sorter = new Sorter();
export default sorter;

import sorter from 'src/common/Sorter';

test('sortItem first item forward', () => {
    const startingArray = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
    const expectedArray = ['b', 'a', 'c', 'd'];
    expect(sorter.sortItem(startingArray, 0, 1)).toStrictEqual(expectedArray);
});
test('sortItem middle item forward', () => {
    const startingArray = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
    const expectedArray = ['a', 'c', 'b', 'd'];
    expect(sorter.sortItem(startingArray, 1, 2)).toStrictEqual(expectedArray);
});
test('sortItem middle item backward', () => {
    const startingArray = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
    const expectedArray = ['a', 'c', 'b', 'd'];
    expect(sorter.sortItem(startingArray, 2, 1)).toStrictEqual(expectedArray);
});
test('sortItem last item backward', () => {
    const startingArray = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
    const expectedArray = ['a', 'b', 'd', 'c'];
    expect(sorter.sortItem(startingArray, 3, 2)).toStrictEqual(expectedArray);
});

We can move array element from one position to another position in many ways. Here I try to solve this in 3 ways in immutably.

Move array element using splice where time complexity is Quadratic Time - O(n^2)

function arrayMove(arr, oldIndex, newIndex) {
  const copiedArr = [...arr];
  const length = copiedArr.length;
  
  if (oldIndex !== newIndex && length > oldIndex && length > newIndex) {
    copiedArr.splice(newIndex, 0, copiedArr.splice(oldIndex, 1)[0]);
  }
  
  return copiedArr;
}

arrayMove([1,2,3,4], 0, 3) // [2,3,4,1]

Move array element using flatMap where time complexity is Linear Time - O(n)

function arrayMove(arr, oldIndex, newIndex) {
    const length = arr.length;
    const itemToMove = arr[oldIndex]

    if (oldIndex === newIndex || oldIndex > length || newIndex > length) {
        return arr;
    }

    return arr.flatMap((item, index) => {
        if (index === oldIndex) return [];
        if (index === newIndex) return oldIndex < newIndex ? [item, itemToMove] : [itemToMove, item];
        return item;
    })
}

arrayMove([1,2,3,4], 0, 3) // [2,3,4,1]

Move array element using reduce where time complexity is Linear Time - O(n)

function arrayMove(arr, oldIndex, newIndex) {
    const length = arr.length;
    const itemToMove = arr[oldIndex]

    if (oldIndex === newIndex || oldIndex > length || newIndex > length) {
        return arr;
    }

    return arr.reduce((acc, item, index) => {
        if (index === oldIndex) return acc;
        if (index === newIndex) return oldIndex < newIndex ? [...acc, item, itemToMove] : [...acc, itemToMove, item];
        return [...acc, item];
    }, [])
}

arrayMove([1,2,3,4], 0, 3) // [2,3,4,1]

You can also checkout this gist: Move an array element from one array position to another

Array.move.js

Summary

Moves elements within an array, returning an array containing the moved elements.

Syntax

array.move(index, howMany, toIndex);

Parameters

index: Index at which to move elements. If negative, index will start from the end.

howMany: Number of elements to move from index.

toIndex: Index of the array at which to place the moved elements. If negative, toIndex will start from the end.

Usage

array = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g"];

array.move(3, 2, 1); // returns ["d","e"]

array; // returns ["a", "d", "e", "b", "c", "f", "g"]

Polyfill

Array.prototype.move || Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "move", {
    value: function (index, howMany, toIndex) {
        var
        array = this,
        index = parseInt(index) || 0,
        index = index < 0 ? array.length + index : index,
        toIndex = parseInt(toIndex) || 0,
        toIndex = toIndex < 0 ? array.length + toIndex : toIndex,
        toIndex = toIndex <= index ? toIndex : toIndex <= index + howMany ? index : toIndex - howMany,
        moved;

        array.splice.apply(array, [toIndex, 0].concat(moved = array.splice(index, howMany)));

        return moved;
    }
});

本文标签： javascriptMove an array element from one array position to anotherStack Overflow