admin管理员组文章数量:1122826
I'm working on a Raft implementation as part of my distributed file system and I've run into a problem with the log compaction process. Accurding to the official Raft paper, when a log reaches a certain length, it may be deleted after taking a 'snapshot' of the system. The snapshot contains the system's state at the time in which it was taken and replaces the logs committed up until then.
The problem is that the snapshot size will be about as big as all the data committed at the time of the snapshot. How can I efficiently handle log compaction and snapshotting without doubling the used system space?
I'm working on a Raft implementation as part of my distributed file system and I've run into a problem with the log compaction process. Accurding to the official Raft paper, when a log reaches a certain length, it may be deleted after taking a 'snapshot' of the system. The snapshot contains the system's state at the time in which it was taken and replaces the logs committed up until then.
The problem is that the snapshot size will be about as big as all the data committed at the time of the snapshot. How can I efficiently handle log compaction and snapshotting without doubling the used system space?
Share Improve this question asked Nov 21, 2024 at 15:46 Dror ChenDror Chen 111 silver badge2 bronze badges1 Answer
Reset to default 1Your reasoning is correct and points to an inherent limitation of Raft and other similar protocols involving logs with compaction: they aren't designed for situations where the size of the state they manage grows without limit. Their typical use case is to manage a state which is bounded in size regardless of how long it exists. A simple example is a bank account balance: it is a single number, so the size of the state - and the compacted log - is independent of the number of debit and credit operations it took to arrive at its current value. Other examples are configuration items such as Kubernetes objects stored in etcd. Kubernetes documentation advises not to store an unbounded amount of objects, say log entries, for precisely the reason you have discovered by yourself.
There are tricks one can use to mitigate the problem, such as handling old data that has not changed recently separately and including it in snapshots by reference, but such tricks rely on specific assumptions about operations and state to be managed and are apt to misbehave when these assumptions are violated. The general solution is to add a level of indirection and use consensus protocols like Raft to manage not your state directly, but the state of the database engine which contains your state.
版权声明:本文标题:What data is stored in the log compaction snapshot of a Raft-based distributed file system? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1736309303a1933970.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论