admin管理员组文章数量:1122791
I am a frequent user of the IEEEtrantool package (giving the IEEEeqnarray environment). Initially it started because I often want one single and centered equation number in a multi-line equation. Later I needed the great flexibility of the IEEEeqnarray(box) option. But I have read that it is advised not to use this package any longer (I do not remember where I have read this and what the arguments were). In order to give you an idea what kind of equation I often make I made a code containing three typical equations.
I have two questions:
- Is it true that IEEEeqnarray is not advised? and what are the reasons?
- What would be the best (most flexible) alternative?
Here is the code:
\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{report}
\usepackage[retainorgcmds]{IEEEtrantools}
\usepackage[most]{tcolorbox}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\begin{document}
First example:
\footnotesize
\begin{equation}
\begin{IEEEeqnarraybox}[][c]{rccl}
e_a:\, &\mathcal C^\infty(\mathbb R^m)&\longrightarrow&\mathbb R\\
&f&\longmapsto &e_a(f)\equiv\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x^a}\right)_p
\end{IEEEeqnarraybox}\quad\text{and}\quad
%
\begin{IEEEeqnarraybox}[][c]{rcl}
\tilde e_a:\, &\mathcal C^\infty(\mathbb R^n)&\longrightarrow\mathbb R\\
&g&\longmapsto \tilde e_a(g)\equiv\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial y^a}\right)_{\phi(p)}
\end{IEEEeqnarraybox}.
\end{equation}
\normalsize
Second example:
\begin{equation}\begin{IEEEeqnarraybox}[][c]{rccccl}
df_p:\, &T_pM&\xrightarrow{\,\sim\,} &T_{f(p)}\mathbb R &\\
&X &\longmapsto\, &df_p(X):\, &\,C^\infty(\mathbb R) &\xrightarrow{\,\sim\,}\mathbb R\\
& & & & g & \longmapsto df_p(X)(g):=X(g\circ f).
\end{IEEEeqnarraybox}\end{equation}
Third example:
\begin{equation}\begin{IEEEeqnarraybox}[][c]{rl}
\tcbox[nobeforeafter]{$
A_jf_i=\sum_{k=1}^\lambda \Gamma(A_j)_{ki}f_k,\qquad i=1,2,\cdots,\lambda;\;j=1,2,\cdots,n, $}
\end{IEEEeqnarraybox}
\end{equation}
%
\end{document}
Can these equations be reproduced with some other package?
I tried align and split but these cannot replace IEEEeqnarray option fully.
本文标签: multilineWhat is a good alternative for the IEEEtrantools packageStack Overflow
版权声明:本文标题:multiline - What is a good alternative for the IEEEtrantools package? - Stack Overflow 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.betaflare.com/web/1736306758a1933073.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论