functional programming - Fixing a Haskell Generator's andAlso Function: Inconsistent Test Results - Stack Overflow

admin管理员组

文章数量:1345068

I'm working with a Haskell implementation of generators for a homework. I have an andAlso function that's supposed to add an additional predicate to a generator, but it's not working correctly in all test cases. Although it seems correct

Here's my generator type definition:

-- Type definition for a generator: a function producing a sequence of values
-- 1. The first function generates the next value.
-- 2. The second function checks if generation should continue.
-- 3. The third value is the initial value, or seed. It does not count as being generated by the generator.
type Generator a = (a -> a, a -> Bool, a)

My current implementation of andAlso:

-- Adds an additional predicate to a generator.
andAlso :: (a -> Bool) -> Generator a -> Generator a
andAlso p (f, g, s) = (f, \x -> g x && p x, s)

I'm using a helper function takeGen to visualize test results:

takeGen :: Int -> ((a -> a), (a -> Bool), a) -> [a]
takeGen 0 _ = []
takeGen n (next, pred, seed)
  | not (pred seed) = []
  | otherwise = seed : takeGen (n-1) (next, pred, next seed)

Test Cases and Results

Here are my test cases and their results:

-- Test 1: Filter for odd numbers
takeGen 10 (andAlso (\x -> x `mod` 2 == 1) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Expected: [1,3,5,7,9], but getting: [1]

-- Test 2: Filter for numbers divisible by 3
takeGen 10 (andAlso (\x -> x `mod` 3 == 0) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Expected: [0,3,6,9], but getting: [0]

-- Test 3: Filter for numbers greater than 5
takeGen 10 (andAlso (>5) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Works correctly: [6,7,8,9]

-- Test 4: Combine two additional predicates
takeGen 10 (andAlso (>3) (andAlso (<8) ((+1), (<10), 0)))
-- Works correctly: [4,5,6,7]

-- Test 5: Test with a different generator function
takeGen 10 (andAlso (<15) ((+2), (<20), 1))
-- Works correctly: [1,3,5,7,9,11,13]

takeGen 10 (andAlso (<10) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Works correctly: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

What I've Tried

I've tried various implementations of andAlso, including:

1. The current implementation shown above
2. Adjusting how predicates are applied in the sequence
3. Attempting to find the first valid value that satisfies both predicates

Some test cases work correctly, but others (specifically tests 1 and 2) don't return all expected values.

My Question

What's wrong with my andAlso implementation, and how should I fix it to make all test cases work as expected? Is the issue with how the generator is defined, how takeGen works, or how andAlso applies the additional predicate?

Additional Context

Other generator-related functions I have implemented:

nthGen :: Integer -> Generator a -> a
nextGen :: Generator a -> Generator a
lengthGen :: Generator a -> Integer
hasLengthOfAtLeast :: Integer -> Generator a -> Bool
constGen :: a -> Generator a
foreverGen :: (a -> a) -> a -> Generator a
emptyGen :: Generator a

Thank you for any help understanding where my implementation is going wrong.

I'm working with a Haskell implementation of generators for a homework. I have an andAlso function that's supposed to add an additional predicate to a generator, but it's not working correctly in all test cases. Although it seems correct

Here's my generator type definition:

-- Type definition for a generator: a function producing a sequence of values
-- 1. The first function generates the next value.
-- 2. The second function checks if generation should continue.
-- 3. The third value is the initial value, or seed. It does not count as being generated by the generator.
type Generator a = (a -> a, a -> Bool, a)

My current implementation of andAlso:

-- Adds an additional predicate to a generator.
andAlso :: (a -> Bool) -> Generator a -> Generator a
andAlso p (f, g, s) = (f, \x -> g x && p x, s)

I'm using a helper function takeGen to visualize test results:

takeGen :: Int -> ((a -> a), (a -> Bool), a) -> [a]
takeGen 0 _ = []
takeGen n (next, pred, seed)
  | not (pred seed) = []
  | otherwise = seed : takeGen (n-1) (next, pred, next seed)

Test Cases and Results

Here are my test cases and their results:

-- Test 1: Filter for odd numbers
takeGen 10 (andAlso (\x -> x `mod` 2 == 1) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Expected: [1,3,5,7,9], but getting: [1]

-- Test 2: Filter for numbers divisible by 3
takeGen 10 (andAlso (\x -> x `mod` 3 == 0) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Expected: [0,3,6,9], but getting: [0]

-- Test 3: Filter for numbers greater than 5
takeGen 10 (andAlso (>5) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Works correctly: [6,7,8,9]

-- Test 4: Combine two additional predicates
takeGen 10 (andAlso (>3) (andAlso (<8) ((+1), (<10), 0)))
-- Works correctly: [4,5,6,7]

-- Test 5: Test with a different generator function
takeGen 10 (andAlso (<15) ((+2), (<20), 1))
-- Works correctly: [1,3,5,7,9,11,13]

takeGen 10 (andAlso (<10) ((+1), (<10), 0))
-- Works correctly: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

What I've Tried

I've tried various implementations of andAlso, including:

1. The current implementation shown above
2. Adjusting how predicates are applied in the sequence
3. Attempting to find the first valid value that satisfies both predicates

Some test cases work correctly, but others (specifically tests 1 and 2) don't return all expected values.

My Question

What's wrong with my andAlso implementation, and how should I fix it to make all test cases work as expected? Is the issue with how the generator is defined, how takeGen works, or how andAlso applies the additional predicate?

Additional Context

Other generator-related functions I have implemented:

nthGen :: Integer -> Generator a -> a
nextGen :: Generator a -> Generator a
lengthGen :: Generator a -> Integer
hasLengthOfAtLeast :: Integer -> Generator a -> Bool
constGen :: a -> Generator a
foreverGen :: (a -> a) -> a -> Generator a
emptyGen :: Generator a

Thank you for any help understanding where my implementation is going wrong.

• haskell
• functional-programming
• generator

Share Improve this question Follow asked 20 hours ago Simon AbadiSimon Abadi 1322 bronze badges New contributor Simon Abadi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. 3

• This Generator type is really just a convoluted way to define a lazy (potentially infinite) list. Since this is homework, I feel perhaps the intention is for you to realize that Generator is "just" a list. The easiest way to define andAlso would be as andAlso p = fromList . filter p . toList (toList and fromList are left to you to implement, but toList should at least be very easy since its basically the same as takeGen). – user2407038 Commented 19 hours ago
• Based on your test cases, andAlso should act as an additional filter, not stopping generation if the additional predicate is not satisfied, but only skipping those elements. This is VERY easy to implement for a list (its just filter) but much harder to implement on the Generator directly. You may find it easier to implement fromList :: [a] -> Generator a which gets you andAlso for free – user2407038 Commented 19 hours ago
• "supposed to add an additional predicate to a generator" is pretty vague. It sounds like you've interpreted it as "Change the Generator's predicate", while the test cases indicate it should do something else. The rest of the exercise looks pretty well documented, so I bet that the exact specification of andAlso would clear things up. – amalloy Commented 19 hours ago

Add a comment  | 

1 Answer 1

Sorted by: Reset to default 0

Note that I can't match your test results with your supplied version of andAlso. (I get more wrong answers than you do, for example.)

However, it looks like you've implemented andAlso to add the supplied predicate to the continuation rule for the generator, but the test cases indicate that it should be treated as a filter for the generator instead.

For example, for "Test 1", your andAlso implementation only continues to generate values as long as the predicate (<10) is true AND the predicate \x -> x `mod` 2 is true. But, for the very first seed of 0 the second predicate fails, so this test generates an empty list [] (which is what I get with your code). Instead, you want to keep generating values as long as (<10) succeeds, but only "pass along" the subset of values that satisfy \x -> x `mod` 2.

It's a little mind-bending to implement andAlso directly, so you might want to follow @user2407038's advice and try implementing fromList and toList.

But, if you want a direct solution, here are a couple of hints. Consider the template definition:

andAlso p (f, g, s) = (f', g', s')

Let's pretend that this generator never stops (so g and g' don't matter). What should f' and s' look like? Well, you want s' to be the first value from the Generator sequence [s, f s, f (f s), ...] that satisfies p. So write:

where s' = find p (f, g, s)

and implement:

find :: (a -> Bool) -> Generator a -> a
find p (f, g, a) = ...

Here, find should pass tests like:

λ> find even ((+1), (<100), 0)
0
λ> find odd ((+1), (<100), 0)
1
λ> find (>10) ((+3), (<100), 0)
12

Don't worry about the stopping rule g in find yet... we'll figure that out in a moment.

Now, what about f'? Well, f' needs to fast-forward the current seed t (whatever it is) to the next seed in the sequence [f t, f (f t), ...] that satisfies p. So, it'll just be:

where f' t = find p (f, g, f t)

(Note the use of f t in place of t to make sure we don't stop at t.)

Now, what about stopping? Well, we want to be careful here that we stop at the first generated value that fails the predicate g, regardless of whether or not it satisfies our filter predicate p.

We can make sure this happens by modifying find so that it stops when g is satisfied, even if the resulting seed fails p. This will ensure that s' is set to the stopping value, so further processing of the generator will stop because g s' will be false.

So, modify find as necessary so it passes the above tests and also works with:

λ> find (>10) ((+1), (<5), 0)
5

That is, it should "find" the first element that fails the continuation predicate (<5), even though this element doesn't satisfy the filter predicate (>10).

With that version of find in place, you should be able to write:

andAlso :: (a -> Bool) -> Generator a -> Generator a
andAlso p (f, g, s) = (f', g, s')
  where s' = find p (f, g, s)
        f' t = find p (f, g, f t)

and have it pass all your tests.

本文标签：