admin管理员组

文章数量:1125616

Trying to get the highest and lowest value from an array that I know will contain only integers seems to be harder than I thought.

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
numArray = numArray.sort();
console.log(numArray)

Trying to get the highest and lowest value from an array that I know will contain only integers seems to be harder than I thought.

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
numArray = numArray.sort();
console.log(numArray)

I'd expect this to show 99, 104, 140000. Instead it shows 104, 140000, 99. So it seems the sort is handling the values as strings.

Is there a way to get the sort function to sort on the integer value of each array element?

• javascript
• arrays
• sorting
• numbers

Share Improve this question Follow edited Jul 5, 2024 at 22:36 Heretic Monkey 12.1k77 gold badges6060 silver badges130130 bronze badges asked Jun 30, 2009 at 10:43 peirixpeirix 37.7k2424 gold badges9797 silver badges129129 bronze badges 10

• 7 BTW, if you're sorting lots and lots of integers it will be advantages to use an integer sort algorithm like counting sort. The time counting sort will take to run scales linearly with the size of your array: O(n). Whereas all solutions here use comparison sort which is less efficient: O(n * log n). – Web_Designer Commented Jun 8, 2017 at 22:08
• 4 @Web_Designer Counting sort is linear regarding the number range, not the array. For example, sorting [1,1000000] will take more than 2 steps, since the algorithm will have to scan each array index between 1 to 1000000 to see which cell's value is greater than 0. – yters Commented Feb 13, 2018 at 15:05
• 2 @yters Using a hashmap, you can only pay attention to the integers that show up in the array being sorted. This makes the sort linear wrt the array size. – Kevin Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 14:02
• 17 It's pretty insane that JS still has this bug... – user894319twitter Commented Feb 10, 2021 at 10:18
• 8 @user894319twitter it's unreal, I honestly can't call it anything then a bug. If that's in the spec then they specified a bug in the specs. It's a bug. – gjvdkamp Commented Jun 17, 2022 at 23:26

 |  Show 5 more comments

34 Answers 34

Sorted by: Reset to default 1 2 Next 2039

By default, the sort method sorts elements alphabetically. To sort numerically just add a new method which handles numeric sorts (sortNumber, shown below) -

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
numArray.sort(function(a, b) {
  return a - b;
});

console.log(numArray);

Documentation:

Mozilla Array.prototype.sort() recommends this compare function for arrays that don't contain Infinity or NaN. (Because Infinity - Infinity is NaN, not 0).

Also examples of sorting objects by key.

Just building on all of the above answers, they can also be done in one line like this:

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
numArray = numArray.sort(function (a, b) {  return a - b;  });

//outputs: 99, 104, 140000

Passing a comparator function to sort() is slower than creating any TypedArray:

var numArray = new Float64Array([140000, 104, 99]);
numArray = numArray.sort();
console.log(numArray)

array.sort does a lexicographic sort by default, for a numeric sort, provide your own function. Here's a simple example:

function compareNumbers(a, b)
{
    return a - b;
}

numArray.sort(compareNumbers);

Also note that sort works "in place", there's no need for the assignment.

This answer is equivalent to some of the existing answers, but ECMAScript 6 arrow functions provide a much more compact syntax that allows us to define an inline sort function without sacrificing readability:

numArray = numArray.sort((a, b) => a - b);

It is supported in most browsers today.

just do .sort((a, b) => a - b) instead of .sort() itself. In addition to that the array is sorted in place. So return value does not matter.

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
numArray.sort((a, b) => a - b);
console.log(numArray)

The reason why the sort function behaves so weird

From the documentation:

[...] the array is sorted according to each character's Unicode code point value, according to the string conversion of each element.

If you print the unicode point values of the array then it will get clear.

console.log("140000".charCodeAt(0));
console.log("104".charCodeAt(0));
console.log("99".charCodeAt(0));

//Note that we only look at the first index of the number "charCodeAt(  0  )"

This returns: "49, 49, 57".

49 (unicode value of first number at 140000)
49 (unicode value of first number at 104)
57 (unicode value of first number at 99)

Now, because 140000 and 104 returned the same values (49) it cuts the first index and checks again:

console.log("40000".charCodeAt(0));
console.log("04".charCodeAt(0));

//Note that we only look at the first index of the number "charCodeAt(  0  )"

52 (unicode value of first number at 40000)
40 (unicode value of first number at 04)

If we sort this, then we will get:

40 (unicode value of first number at 04)
52 (unicode value of first number at 40000)

so 104 comes before 140000.

So the final result will be:

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
numArray = numArray.sort();
console.log(numArray)

104, 140000, 99

Conclusion:

sort() does sorting by only looking at the first index of the numbers. sort() does not care if a whole number is bigger than another, it compares the value of the unicode of the digits, and if there are two equal unicode values, then it checks if there is a next digit and compares it as well.

To sort correctly, you have to pass a compare function to sort() like explained here.

Ascending

arr.sort((a, b) => a - b);

Descending

arr.sort((a, b) => b - a);

Just for fun:

Descending = Ascending + Reverse

arr.sort((a, b) => a - b).reverse();

Array.sort uses alphabetic sorting by default instead of numeric .

To support numbers, add like following

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
numArray.sort((a, b) =>  a - b); // <-- Ascending
numArray.sort((a, b) =>  b - a); // <-- Descending
console.log(numArray);

OUTPUT :

I agree with aks, however instead of using

return a - b;

You should use

return a > b ? 1 : a < b ? -1 : 0;

The question has already been answered, the shortest way is to use sort() method. But if you're searching for more ways to sort your array of numbers, and you also love cycles, check the following

Insertion sort

Ascending:

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
for (var i = 0; i < numArray.length; i++) {
    var target = numArray[i];
    for (var j = i - 1; j >= 0 && (numArray[j] > target); j--) {
        numArray[j+1] = numArray[j];
    }
    numArray[j+1] = target
}
console.log(numArray);

Descending:

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
for (var i = 0; i < numArray.length; i++) {
    var target = numArray[i];
    for (var j = i - 1; j >= 0 && (numArray[j] < target); j--) {
        numArray[j+1] = numArray[j];
    }
    numArray[j+1] = target
}
console.log(numArray);

Selection sort:

Ascending:

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
for (var i = 0; i < numArray.length - 1; i++) {
    var min = i;
    for (var j = i + 1; j < numArray.length; j++) {
        if (numArray[j] < numArray[min]) {
            min = j;
        }
    }
    if (min != i) {
        var target = numArray[i];
        numArray[i] = numArray[min];
        numArray[min] = target;
    }
}
console.log(numArray);

Descending:

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
for (var i = 0; i < numArray.length - 1; i++) {
    var min = i;
    for (var j = i + 1; j < numArray.length; j++) {
        if (numArray[j] > numArray[min]) {
            min = j;
        }
    }
    if (min != i) {
        var target = numArray[i];
        numArray[i] = numArray[min];
        numArray[min] = target;
    }
}
console.log(numArray);

Have fun

In JavaScript the sort() method's default behaviour is to sort values in an array alphabetically.

To sort by number you have to define a numeric sort function (which is very easy):

...
function sortNumber(a, b)
{
  return a - b;
}

numArray = numArray.sort(sortNumber);

Array.prototype.sort() is the go to method for sorting arrays, but there are a couple of issues we need to be aware of.

The sorting order is by default lexicographic and not numeric regardless of the types of values in the array. Even if the array is all numbers, all values will be converted to string and sorted lexicographically.

So should we need to customize the sort() and reverse() method like below.

Referred URL

For sorting numbers inside the array

numArray.sort(function(a, b)
{
    return a - b;
});

For reversing numbers inside the array

numArray.sort(function(a, b)
{
    return b - a;
});

Referred URL

The function 'numerically' below serves the purpose of sorting array of numbers numerically in many cases when provided as a callback function:

function numerically(a, b){
    return a-b;
}

array.sort(numerically); 

But in some rare instances, where array contains very large and negative numbers, an overflow error can occur as the result of a-b gets smaller than the smallest number that JavaScript can cope with.

So a better way of writing numerically function is as follows:

function numerically(a, b){
   if(a < b){
      return -1;
   } else if(a > b){
      return 1;
   } else {
      return 0;
   }
}

to handle undefined, null, and NaN: Null behaves like 0, NaN and undefined goes to end.

array = [3, 5, -1, 1, NaN, 6, undefined, 2, null]
array.sort((a,b) => isNaN(a) || a-b)
// [-1, null, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, NaN, undefined]

The accepted answer and equivalents like numArray.sort((a,b) => a - b) are great when the array contains only numbers without infinities or NaN. They can be extended to handle infinities and NaN like so:

numArray.sort((a,b) => (+a || 0) - (+b || 0) || 0);

This sorts NaN (or any non-number, like 'foo' or {}) as if it were 0. The final || 0 is needed to handle the case where a and b are equal infinities.

While not required in JavaScript, if you would like the sort() compareFunction to strictly return -1, 0, or 1 (similar to how the spaceship operator works in PHP), then you can use Math.sign().

The compareFunction below strictly returns -1, 0, or 1:

numArray.sort((a, b) => Math.sign(a - b));

Note: Math.sign() is not supported in Internet Explorer.

For a normal array of elements values only:

function sortArrayOfElements(arrayToSort) {
    function compareElements(a, b) {
        if (a < b)
            return -1;
        if (a > b)
            return 1;
        return 0;
    }

    return arrayToSort.sort(compareElements);
}

e.g. 1:
var array1 = [1,2,545,676,64,2,24]
**output : [1, 2, 2, 24, 64, 545, 676]**

var array2 = ["v","a",545,676,64,2,"24"]
**output: ["a", "v", 2, "24", 64, 545, 676]**

For an array of objects:

function sortArrayOfObjects(arrayToSort, key) {
    function compareObjects(a, b) {
        if (a[key] < b[key])
            return -1;
        if (a[key] > b[key])
            return 1;
        return 0;
    }

    return arrayToSort.sort(compareObjects);
}

e.g. 1: var array1= [{"name": "User4", "value": 4},{"name": "User3", "value": 3},{"name": "User2", "value": 2}]

**output : [{"name": "User2", "value": 2},{"name": "User3", "value": 3},{"name": "User4", "value": 4}]**

TypeScript variant

const compareNumbers = (a: number, b: number): number => a - b

myArray.sort(compareNumbers)

In order to create this kind of sort, you have to pass a function that will check which comes first.

define inside the function which value do you wanna check: a.id - a.id

        const myJson = [
            { id: 1, name: 'one'},
            { id: 4, name: 'four'},
            { id: 2, name: 'two'},
            { id: 3, name: 'three'}
        ];

        // provide the sort method to check
        const myNewSort = myJson.sort(function(a, b) {
          return a.id - b.id;
        });

        console.log('my new sort',myNewSort)

Update! Scroll to bottom of answer for smartSort prop additive that gives even more fun!
Sorts arrays of anything!

My personal favorite form of this function allows for a param for Ascending, or Descending:

function intArraySort(c, a) {
    function d(a, b) { return b - a; }
    "string" == typeof a && a.toLowerCase();
    switch (a) {
        default: return c.sort(function(a, b) { return a - b; });
        case 1:
                case "d":
                case "dc":
                case "desc":
                return c.sort(d)
    }
};

Usage as simple as:

var ara = function getArray() {
        var a = Math.floor(Math.random()*50)+1, b = [];
        for (i=0;i<=a;i++) b.push(Math.floor(Math.random()*50)+1);
        return b;
    }();

//    Ascending
intArraySort(ara);
console.log(ara);

//    Descending
intArraySort(ara, 1);
console.log(ara);

//    Ascending
intArraySort(ara, 'a');
console.log(ara);

//    Descending
intArraySort(ara, 'dc');
console.log(ara);

//    Ascending
intArraySort(ara, 'asc');
console.log(ara);

jsFiddle

---

Or Code Snippet Example Here!

function intArraySort(c, a) {
	function d(a, b) { return b - a }
	"string" == typeof a && a.toLowerCase();
	switch (a) {
		default: return c.sort(function(a, b) { return a - b });
		case 1:
		case "d":
		case "dc":
		case "desc":
		return c.sort(d)
	}
};

function tableExample() {
	var d = function() {
			var a = Math.floor(50 * Math.random()) + 1,
				b = [];
			for (i = 0; i <= a; i++) b.push(Math.floor(50 * Math.random()) + 1);
			return b
		},
		a = function(a) {
			var b = $("<tr/>"),
				c = $("<th/>").prependTo(b);
			$("<td/>", {
				text: intArraySort(d(), a).join(", ")
			}).appendTo(b);
			switch (a) {
				case 1:
				case "d":
				case "dc":
				case "desc":
					c.addClass("desc").text("Descending");
					break;
				default:
					c.addClass("asc").text("Ascending")
			}
			return b
		};
	return $("tbody").empty().append(a(), a(1), a(), a(1), a(), a(1), a(), a(1), a(), a(1), a(), a(1))
};

tableExample();

table { border-collapse: collapse; }
th, td { border: 1px solid; padding: .25em .5em; vertical-align: top; }
.asc { color: red; }
.desc { color: blue }

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<table><tbody></tbody></table>

---

.smartSort('asc' | 'desc')

Now have even more fun with a sorting method that sorts an array full of multiple items! Doesn't currently cover "associative" (aka, string keys), but it does cover about every type of value! Not only will it sort the multiple values asc or desc accordingly, but it will also maintain constant "position" of "groups" of values. In other words; ints are always first, then come strings, then arrays (yes, i'm making this multidimensional!), then Objects (unfiltered, element, date), & finally undefineds and nulls!

"Why?" you ask. Why not!

Now comes in 2 flavors! The first of which requires newer browsers as it uses Object.defineProperty to add the method to the Array.protoype Object. This allows for ease of natural use, such as: myArray.smartSort('a'). If you need to implement for older browsers, or you simply don't like modifying native Objects, scroll down to Method Only version.

/* begin */
/* KEY NOTE! Requires EcmaScript 5.1 (not compatible with older browsers) */
;;(function(){if(Object.defineProperty&&!Array.prototype.smartSort){var h=function(a,b){if(null==a||void 0==a)return 1;if(null==b||void 0==b)return-1;var c=typeof a,e=c+typeof b;if(/^numbernumber$/ig.test(e))return a-b;if(/^stringstring$/ig.test(e))return a>b;if(/(string|number){2}/ig.test(e))return/string/i.test(c)?1:-1;if(/number/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e)||/string/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e))return/object/i.test(c)?1:-1;if(/^objectobject$/ig.test(e)){a instanceof Array&&a.smartSort("a");b instanceof Array&&b.smartSort("a");if(a instanceof Date&&b instanceof Date)return a-b;if(a instanceof Array&&b instanceof Array){var e=Object.keys(a),g=Object.keys(b),e=e.concat(g).smartSort("a"),d;for(d in e)if(c=e[d],a[c]!=b[c])return d=[a[c],b[c]].smartSort("a"),a[c]==d[0]?-1:1;var f=[a[Object.keys(a)[0]],b[Object.keys(b)[0]]].smartSort("a");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==f[0]?-1:1}if(a instanceof Element&&b instanceof Element){if(a.tagName==b.tagName)return e=[a.id,b.id].smartSort("a"),a.id==e[0]?1:-1;e=[a.tagName, b.tagName].smartSort("a");return a.tagName==e[0]?1:-1}if(a instanceof Date||b instanceof Date)return a instanceof Date?1:-1;if(a instanceof Array||b instanceof Array)return a instanceof Array?-1:1;e=Object.keys(a);g=Object.keys(b);e.concat(g).smartSort("a");for(c=0;20>c;c++){d=e[c];f=g[c];if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&&b.hasOwnProperty(f)){if(a[d]instanceof Element&&b[f]instanceof Element){if(a[d].tagName==b[f].tagName)return c=[a[d].id,b[f].id].smartSort("a"),a[d].id==c[0]?-1:1;c=[a[d].tagName,b[f].tagName].smartSort("d"); return a[d].tagName==c[0]?1:-1}if(a[d]instanceof Element||b[f]instanceof Element)return a[d]instanceof Element?1:-1;if(a[d]!=b[f])return c=[a[d],b[f]].smartSort("a"),a[d]==c[0]?-1:1}if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&&a[d]instanceof Element)return 1;if(b.hasOwnProperty(f)&&b[f]instanceof Element||!a.hasOwnProperty(d))return-1;if(!b.hasOwnProperty(d))return 1}c=[a[Object.keys(a)[0]],b[Object.keys(b)[0]]].smartSort("d");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==c[0]?-1:1}g=[a,b].sort();return g[0]>g[1]},k=function(a,b){if(null== a||void 0==a)return 1;if(null==b||void 0==b)return-1;var c=typeof a,e=c+typeof b;if(/^numbernumber$/ig.test(e))return b-a;if(/^stringstring$/ig.test(e))return b>a;if(/(string|number){2}/ig.test(e))return/string/i.test(c)?1:-1;if(/number/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e)||/string/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e))return/object/i.test(c)?1:-1;if(/^objectobject$/ig.test(e)){a instanceof Array&&a.smartSort("d");b instanceof Array&&b.smartSort("d");if(a instanceof Date&&b instanceof Date)return b-a;if(a instanceof Array&&b instanceof Array){var e=Object.keys(a),g=Object.keys(b),e=e.concat(g).smartSort("a"),d;for(d in e)if(c=e[d],a[c]!=b[c])return d=[a[c],b[c]].smartSort("d"),a[c]==d[0]?-1:1;var f=[a[Object.keys(a)[0]],b[Object.keys(b)[0]]].smartSort("d");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==f[0]?-1:1}if(a instanceof Element&&b instanceof Element){if(a.tagName==b.tagName)return e=[a.id,b.id].smartSort("d"),a.id==e[0]?-1:1;e=[a.tagName,b.tagName].smartSort("d");return a.tagName==e[0]?-1:1}if(a instanceof Date||b instanceof Date)return a instanceof Date?1:-1;if(a instanceof Array||b instanceof Array)return a instanceof Array?-1:1;e=Object.keys(a);g=Object.keys(b);e.concat(g).smartSort("a");for(c=0;20>c;c++){d=e[c];f=g[c];if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&&b.hasOwnProperty(f)){if(a[d]instanceof Element&&b[f]instanceof Element){if(a[d].tagName==b[f].tagName)return c=[a[d].id,b[f].id].smartSort("d"),a[d].id==c[0]?-1:1;c=[a[d].tagName,b[f].tagName].smartSort("d");return a[d].tagName==c[0]?-1:1}if(a[d]instanceof Element||b[f]instanceof Element)return a[d]instanceof Element?1:-1;if(a[d]!=b[f])return c=[a[d],b[f]].smartSort("d"),a[d]==c[0]?-1:1}if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&&a[d]instanceof Element)return 1;if(b.hasOwnProperty(f)&&b[f]instanceof Element)return-1;if(!a.hasOwnProperty(d))return 1;if(!b.hasOwnProperty(d))return-1}c=[a[Object.keys(a)[0]],b[Object.keys(b)[0]]].smartSort("d");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==c[0]?-1:1}g=[a,b].sort();return g[0]<g[1]};Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype,"smartSort",{value:function(){return arguments&& (!arguments.length||1==arguments.length&&/^a([sc]{2})?$|^d([esc]{3})?$/i.test(arguments[0]))?this.sort(!arguments.length||/^a([sc]{2})?$/i.test(arguments[0])?h:k):this.sort()}})}})();
/* end */

jsFiddle Array.prototype.smartSort('asc|desc')

---

Use is simple! First make some crazy array like:

window.z = [ 'one', undefined, $('<span />'), 'two', null, 2, $('<div />', { id: 'Thing' }), $('<div />'), 4, $('<header />') ];
z.push(new Date('1/01/2011'));
z.push('three');
z.push(undefined);
z.push([ 'one', 'three', 'four' ]);
z.push([ 'one', 'three', 'five' ]);
z.push({ a: 'a', b: 'b' });
z.push({ name: 'bob', value: 'bill' });
z.push(new Date());
z.push({ john: 'jill', jack: 'june' });
z.push([ 'abc', 'def', [ 'abc', 'def', 'cba' ], [ 'cba', 'def', 'bca' ], 'cba' ]);
z.push([ 'cba', 'def', 'bca' ]);
z.push({ a: 'a', b: 'b', c: 'c' });
z.push({ a: 'a', b: 'b', c: 'd' });

Then simply sort it!

z.smartSort('asc'); // Ascending
z.smartSort('desc'); // Descending

---

Method Only

Same as the preceding, except as just a simple method!

/* begin */
/* KEY NOTE! Method `smartSort` is appended to native `window` for global use. If you'd prefer a more local scope, simple change `window.smartSort` to `var smartSort` and place inside your class/method */
window.smartSort=function(){if(arguments){var a,b,c;for(c in arguments)arguments[c]instanceof Array&&(a=arguments[c],void 0==b&&(b="a")),"string"==typeof arguments[c]&&(b=/^a([sc]{2})?$/i.test(arguments[c])?"a":"d");if(a instanceof Array)return a.sort("a"==b?smartSort.asc:smartSort.desc)}return this.sort()};smartSort.asc=function(a,b){if(null==a||void 0==a)return 1;if(null==b||void 0==b)return-1;var c=typeof a,e=c+typeof b;if(/^numbernumber$/ig.test(e))return a-b;if(/^stringstring$/ig.test(e))return a> b;if(/(string|number){2}/ig.test(e))return/string/i.test(c)?1:-1;if(/number/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e)||/string/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e))return/object/i.test(c)?1:-1;if(/^objectobject$/ig.test(e)){a instanceof Array&&a.sort(smartSort.asc);b instanceof Array&&b.sort(smartSort.asc);if(a instanceof Date&&b instanceof Date)return a-b;if(a instanceof Array&&b instanceof Array){var e=Object.keys(a),g=Object.keys(b),e=smartSort(e.concat(g),"a"),d;for(d in e)if(c=e[d],a[c]!=b[c])return d=smartSort([a[c], b[c]],"a"),a[c]==d[0]?-1:1;var f=smartSort([a[Object.keys(a)[0]],b[Object.keys(b)[0]]],"a");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==f[0]?-1:1}if(a instanceof Element&&b instanceof Element){if(a.tagName==b.tagName)return e=smartSort([a.id,b.id],"a"),a.id==e[0]?1:-1;e=smartSort([a.tagName,b.tagName],"a");return a.tagName==e[0]?1:-1}if(a instanceof Date||b instanceof Date)return a instanceof Date?1:-1;if(a instanceof Array||b instanceof Array)return a instanceof Array?-1:1;e=Object.keys(a);g=Object.keys(b);smartSort(e.concat(g), "a");for(c=0;20>c;c++){d=e[c];f=g[c];if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&&b.hasOwnProperty(f)){if(a[d]instanceof Element&&b[f]instanceof Element){if(a[d].tagName==b[f].tagName)return c=smartSort([a[d].id,b[f].id],"a"),a[d].id==c[0]?-1:1;c=smartSort([a[d].tagName,b[f].tagName],"a");return a[d].tagName==c[0]?-1:1}if(a[d]instanceof Element||b[f]instanceof Element)return a[d]instanceof Element?1:-1;if(a[d]!=b[f])return c=smartSort([a[d],b[f]],"a"),a[d]==c[0]?-1:1}if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&&a[d]instanceof Element)return 1; if(b.hasOwnProperty(f)&&b[f]instanceof Element||!a.hasOwnProperty(d))return-1;if(!b.hasOwnProperty(d))return 1}c=smartSort([a[Object.keys(a)[0]],b[Object.keys(b)[0]]],"a");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==c[0]?1:-1}g=[a,b].sort();return g[0]>g[1]};smartSort.desc=function(a,b){if(null==a||void 0==a)return 1;if(null==b||void 0==b)return-1;var c=typeof a,e=c+typeof b;if(/^numbernumber$/ig.test(e))return b-a;if(/^stringstring$/ig.test(e))return b>a;if(/(string|number){2}/ig.test(e))return/string/i.test(c)? 1:-1;if(/number/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e)||/string/ig.test(e)&&/object/ig.test(e))return/object/i.test(c)?1:-1;if(/^objectobject$/ig.test(e)){a instanceof Array&&a.sort(smartSort.desc);b instanceof Array&&b.sort(smartSort.desc);if(a instanceof Date&&b instanceof Date)return b-a;if(a instanceof Array&&b instanceof Array){var e=Object.keys(a),g=Object.keys(b),e=smartSort(e.concat(g),"a"),d;for(d in e)if(c=e[d],a[c]!=b[c])return d=smartSort([a[c],b[c]],"d"),a[c]==d[0]?-1:1;var f=smartSort([a[Object.keys(a)[0]], b[Object.keys(b)[0]]],"d");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==f[0]?-1:1}if(a instanceof Element&&b instanceof Element){if(a.tagName==b.tagName)return e=smartSort([a.id,b.id],"d"),a.id==e[0]?-1:1;e=smartSort([a.tagName,b.tagName],"d");return a.tagName==e[0]?-1:1}if(a instanceof Date||b instanceof Date)return a instanceof Date?1:-1;if(a instanceof Array||b instanceof Array)return a instanceof Array?-1:1;e=Object.keys(a);g=Object.keys(b);smartSort(e.concat(g),"a");for(c=0;20>c;c++){d=e[c];f=g[c];if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&& b.hasOwnProperty(f)){if(a[d]instanceof Element&&b[f]instanceof Element){if(a[d].tagName==b[f].tagName)return c=smartSort([a[d].id,b[f].id],"d"),a[d].id==c[0]?-1:1;c=smartSort([a[d].tagName,b[f].tagName],"d");return a[d].tagName==c[0]?-1:1}if(a[d]instanceof Element||b[f]instanceof Element)return a[d]instanceof Element?1:-1;if(a[d]!=b[f])return c=smartSort([a[d],b[f]],"d"),a[d]==c[0]?-1:1}if(a.hasOwnProperty(d)&&a[d]instanceof Element)return 1;if(b.hasOwnProperty(f)&&b[f]instanceof Element)return-1; if(!a.hasOwnProperty(d))return 1;if(!b.hasOwnProperty(d))return-1}c=smartSort([a[Object.keys(a)[0]],b[Object.keys(b)[0]]],"d");return a[Object.keys(a)[0]]==c[0]?-1:1}g=[a,b].sort();return g[0]<g[1]}
/* end */

Use:

z = smartSort(z, 'asc'); // Ascending
z = smartSort(z, 'desc'); // Descending

jsFiddle Method smartSort(Array, "asc|desc")

Try this code:

HTML:

<div id="demo"></div>

JavaScript code:

<script>
    (function(){
        var points = [40, 100, 1, 5, 25, 10];
        document.getElementById("demo").innerHTML = points;
        points.sort(function(a, b){return a-b});
        document.getElementById("demo").innerHTML = points;
    })();
</script>

Try this code as below

var a = [5, 17, 29, 48, 64, 21];
function sortA(arr) {
return arr.sort(function(a, b) {
return a - b;
})
;} 
alert(sortA(a));

Sort integers > 0, think outside the box:

function sortArray(arr) {
  return new Promise((resolve) => {
    const result = []
    arr.forEach((item) => {
      setTimeout(() => {
        result.push(item)
        if (result.length === arr.length) resolve(result)
      }, item)
    })
  })
}

sortArray([4, 2, 42, 128, 56, 2]).then((result) => {
  document.write(JSON.stringify(result))
})

Note that this should not be used productively, .sort() is better suited for this, check the other answers

You can sort number array simply by

const num=[13,17,14,19,16];
let temp;
for(let i=0;i<num.length;i++){
    for(let j=i+1;j<num.length;j++){
        if(num[i]>num[j]){
            temp=num[i]
            num[i]=num[j]
            num[j]=temp
        }
    }
}

console.log(num);

You can get height and lowest number simply by using max() and min() in-built function

var numArray = [140000, 104, 99];
console.log(Math.max(...numArray));
console.log(Math.min(...numArray));

If you want to sort in ascending or descending order

numArray.sort((a, b)=> a - b);

Know more

let grade =[80,100,50,90,40];
grade.sort((x,y)=> x-y);
grade.forEach(element=>console.log(element));

As sort method converts Array elements into string. So, below way also works fine with decimal numbers with array elements.

let productPrices = [10.33, 2.55, 1.06, 5.77];
console.log(productPrices.sort((a,b)=>a-b));

And gives you the expected result.

sort_mixed

Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype,"sort_mixed",{
    value: function () { // do not use arrow function
        var N = [], L = [];
        this.forEach(e => {
            Number.isFinite(e) ? N.push(e) : L.push(e);
        });
        N.sort((a, b) => a - b);
        L.sort();
        [...N, ...L].forEach((v, i) => this[i] = v);
        return this;
    })

try a =[1,'u',"V",10,4,"c","A"].sort_mixed(); console.log(a)

If anyone doesn't understand how Array.sort() works with integers, read this answer.

Alphabetical order:

By default, the sort() method sorts the values as strings in alphabetical and ascending order.

const myArray = [104, 140000, 99];
myArray.sort();
console.log(myArray); // output is [104, 140000, 99]

Ascending order with array.sort(compareFunction):

const myArray = [104, 140000, 99];
myArray.sort(function(a, b){
  return a - b;
});
console.log(myArray); // output is [99, 104, 140000]

Explanation from w3schools:

compareFunction defines an alternative sort order. The function should return a negative, zero, or positive value, depending on the arguments, like: function(a, b){return a-b} When the sort() method compares two values, it sends the values to the compare function, and sorts the values according to the returned (negative, zero, positive) value.

Example:

When comparing 40 and 100, the sort() method calls the compare function(40,100).

The function calculates 40-100, and returns -60 (a negative value).

The sort function will sort 40 as a value lower than 100.

Descending order with array.sort(compareFunction):

const myArray = [104, 140000, 99];
myArray.sort(function(a, b){
  return b - a;
});
console.log(myArray); // output is [140000, 104, 99]

This time we calculated with b - a(i.e., 100-40) which returns a positive value.

本文标签：